wiremock #wiremock-java

Tom

01/17/2023, 1:47 PM

IIRC it will usually try to determine which mode to use based on the request entity object. If it can determine the length it’ll send the Content-Length header, otherwise it’ll go chunked.

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 1:53 PM

i'll try and look in the code and see if it is being set

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 1:53 PM

might be a bug in their sdk

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 3:59 PM

hmm, seems i can only work with jre8-standalone

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:00 PM

Because there’s a conflicting version of HTTPClient in the non-standalone version?

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:00 PM

i think so

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:00 PM

between gradle + our dependency

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:04 PM

4.5.14 (sdk + org.springframework.cloudspring cloud test support4.0.0) 5:5.1.4 (org.springframework.cloudspring cloud contract wiremock4.0.0) + gradle also seemed to have it bundled in (gradle 7.6 - 4.4.16 + kotlin gradle plugin 1.8)

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:05 PM

I think 4 and 5 should be able to cohabit, since 5 has got

client5

in its artifact name and packages

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:06 PM

Having said that at the moment standalone is usually the best bet when working with Spring. Is there a specific issue you have with that one?

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:07 PM

just fails to bind now i think

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:08 PM

Can you share the details? I know many teams use standalone as a dependency with Spring, including the Spring Cloud Contract team, so it should work OK.

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:08 PM

prob my code, will check

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:08 PM

on latest 3. beta version?

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:09 PM

The 3.x beta fixes the main reason you need to use standalone, so with that you should be able to use either. If you want to use 2.x with Spring Boot 3.x you’ll need standalone.

Russ Garratt

01/17/2023, 4:10 PM

would like to say thanks for all the help you have given so far!

Tom

01/17/2023, 4:10 PM

No problem!

Sinan Pehlivanoglu

01/17/2023, 5:43 PM

Hello! I have been trying to port our tests from MockServer to WireMock at work. Sadly it hasn't gone as smooth as I was hoping. I hit some issues, was hoping you could give a few ideas. I had some original questions but in the time being WireMockServer completely stopped working 😅

Copy code

Not listening on HTTP port. Either HTTP is not enabled or the WireMock server is stopped.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not listening on HTTP port. Either HTTP is not enabled or the WireMock server is stopped.
	at wiremock.com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState(Preconditions.java:444)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.port(WireMockServer.java:179)

Found this: https://github.com/bakdata/fluent-kafka-streams-tests/issues/22 and this: https://groups.google.com/g/wiremock-user/c/4kkOMn58CzM?pli=1 JUnit version

4.13.2

testImplementation "junit:junit:4.13.2"

Being going through the recently merged code to see what could have caused this in the past 24 hours but I can't quite tell.

Copy code

private Environment newEnvironmentInstance(.....) {
        .... some code here .... 

        final WireMockConfiguration config = wireMockConfig().dynamicPort();
        final WireMockServer mockServer = new WireMockServer(config);
        environment.setUrl(URI.create("<http://localhost>:" + mockServer.port()));
        environment.setService(URI.create("<http://localhost>:" + mockServer.port()));
        environment.setInitial(initial);
        <http://logger.info|logger.info>("Environment started: {} on port {} ({})",
                environment.getId(), mockServer.port(), environment.getName());

        mockServer.start();

        mockServer.stubFor(.....)
  }

Any thoughts what might have caused this?

Tom

01/17/2023, 5:54 PM

Hi @Sinan Pehlivanoglu you need to call

mockServer.start()

before

mockServer.port()

since when you use dynamically assigned ports they’re only assigned at startup.

Sinan Pehlivanoglu

01/17/2023, 6:10 PM

Thank you!

👍 1

Neal Hawman

01/18/2023, 3:22 PM

Hi. I've been using WireMock for some testing and I had a requirement for a web service to keep looping round whenever it gets a 429 error until the target web site corrects itself and returns a 200. I was wondering if there was any way to simulate this in the WireMock JSON configuration files. I know there is an __admin/requests/count endpoint but that will just tell me the number of requests that have been made at a given time. I want to put a condition in the config file so that e.g. on the first 4 calls, the mock returns 429 but on subsequent calls it returns 200.

ines rattab

01/19/2023, 7:51 AM

Hello, I'm using wiremock to test mutual ssl connection with an external API. But i'm getting this error

client_cacerts.jks is not a valid keystore

, although it is valid , here is the code

Copy code

WireMockServer wireMock = new WireMockServer(wireMockConfig()
      //.port(8080)
      .httpsPort(8443)
      .needClientAuth(true)
      .keystoreType("jks")
      .keystorePath("client_keystore.jks") // Either a path to a file or a resource on the classpath
      .keystorePassword("secret")
      .keyManagerPassword("secret")
      .trustStorePath("client_cacerts.jks")// The password used to access the keystore. Defaults to "password" if omitted
      .trustStorePassword("secret")
);
@Test
void test() {
   wireMock.start();
   wireMock.stubFor(
         WireMock.get("/hello")
               .willReturn(WireMock.ok("world"))
   );

Any thoughts what might be causing this error ?

Sinan Pehlivanoglu

01/19/2023, 4:24 PM

Copy code

RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.StubRequestHandler. Normalized mapped under returned 'null'

Could someone explain what this means? Seeing it in our logs while trying to debug something

Sofia Pacifico

01/19/2023, 5:59 PM

Hi everyone, hope my message finds you well. I am using wiremock docker image and I am working on some security vulnerabilities founded, for example in the sqlite version (SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a string argument to a C API.) is something that I should ignore or someone can help me to upgrade the version? In advance, thanks for your help!

Tom

01/19/2023, 7:34 PM

Hi @Sofia Pacifico WireMock doesn't use SQLite at all so from that perspective you're safe. I'm surprised to see that SQLite is even present in the image though. Do you mind sharing your scan report and the details of the tool you used to obtain it?

👍 1

Deepak Shakya

01/20/2023, 8:46 AM

Has anybody tried the inverse regular expression with urlPattern and urlPathPattern? I wanted to configure those in the proxies so that all requests are routed to the proxy except for the ones that I configure as the mock. For example, I have two mocks at following endpoints

Copy code

/endpoint/customers/abc123
/endpoint/customers/abc456

For requests that come for the above paths (

/endpoint/customers/abc\d+

), I want the mocks to be used. For anything else, it can routed to the proxy. Here is how I am trying to configure the proxy.

Copy code

{
  "request": {
    "method": "ANY",
    "urlPattern": "/endpoint/customers/(?!abc\\d+)"
  },
  "response": {
    "proxyBaseUrl": "<http://real-customer-endpoint/api>",
    "proxyUrlPrefixToRemove": "/endpoint"
  }
}

But this doesn't seem to work. Am I missing something or this is not possible? Also, what are your thoughts on having the inverse filters likes urlPatternNotMatching and urlPathPatternNotMatching as I suggested them here - https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/2068

Alessandro Bramati

01/20/2023, 9:54 AM

Hi folks, Do you know if Wiremock allows to load more than one keystore (and truststore) in order to make mutual authentication for more than one service in the same Wiremock instance? If not, is it possible to implement and extension? Alessandro

Pavel Serada

01/20/2023, 5:15 PM

Hello dear community! Need your help! Given stub to map value from Json request body to Response:

{{{jsonPath request.body '$..paths[1].source'}}}

Copy code

{
  "request": {
    "urlPattern": ".*/transfers",
    "method": "POST"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "body": "{\"id\":  \"{{{jsonPath request.body '$..paths[1].source'}}}\",

Request is a valid Json structure containing this part in its body, and I need to get blablablah2 from request body to return it in response body:

Copy code

{
  "paths": [
    {
      "source": "blablablah1",
      "destination": "blablablah1"
    },
    {
      "source": "blablablah2",
      "destination": "blablablah2"
    }
  ]
}

My issue is that Wiremock returns:

"body": "{\"id\":  \"[\"*blablablah2*\"]\",

and I'd like to get it without [ ]
, any idea why it's happening? Actual:

"body": "{\"id\":  \"[\"*blablablah2*\"]\",

Expected:

"body": "{\"id\":  \"*blablablah2*\",

👀 1

Joaquin Penalver

01/24/2023, 9:12 AM

Hello I've a question for someone expert in wiremock

Joaquin Penalver

01/24/2023, 9:14 AM

We're using wiremock-studio:2.32.0-18 docker image, I'm trying to pass some arguments to the docker image in order to customize it, for example enabling HTTPS but the wiremock throw an error

Copy code

wiremock    | Exception in thread "main" joptsimple.UnrecognizedOptionException: https-port is not a recognized option