set the channel description: Questions and discussion about WireMock Cloud

Hi @Tom, Can we still use wiremock studio ? or we need to migrate to wiremock cloud

we are using wiremock studio to import api spec file and generating mock

Hello. IIUC there is no way to enable Chaos engineering only for a particular endpoint, or to configure chaos for them individually, right? Please correct me if I am wrong

set the channel topic: Questions and discussion about WireMock Cloud - https://www.wiremock.io/

Hi I’m looking for some tools, for mocking external/ third party Api, One of my friend suggested Wire Mock. I have some business requirement to confirm before proceeding with installation and using it within organization. These are as follows • Ability to generate mock based on existing calls and API definition (OpenApi, Swagger) • Ability to work with web hooks (call and receive) • Monitor traffic (see calls, logs, metrics) • Support of Auth flows (OAuth, OpenID etc) • Ability to run locally or run many environments can anyone help to in regards to these requirements

Hi will be glad to help with that - WireMock Cloud supports all of these requirements.

You can review some stuff here - https://www.wiremock.io/ and I will also be be glad to connect you with someone from our technical team to present an end to end demo, discuss your use case and make sure we answer all your questions

Hi @Uri thank you for the prompt response. Can you help me with this feature. Monitor traffic (see calls, logs, metrics)->where i can find relevant document to it

The question is what level of details you want to go in the monitoring - we have a request log which can show you the calls being made. Also, we have a way to create mocks from recording traffic. Hope this info helps

is their any document related to it so that i can go through

You can see some docs here for recording - https://docs.wiremock.io/recording-stubs/ - I don't think we documented the request log. As mentioned, will be glad to just set a quick call with the tech team, and discuss further and see if we can help - Let me know if it make sense

hi guys, any issues in https://app.wiremock.cloud/? I cannot access it since this morning (GMT +7), my coworkers also cannot access the web as well, I'm accessing it from Indonesia

Hi everyone. I have come across the following issue(s) and was looking for some feedback. Background We had been using a API Virtualization Tool to simulate our APIs. But this tool was $$$ and required pretty extensive development to simulate our APIs. A decision was made to not renew the license and move back to simple mocking — our WSO2 branded API Gateway uses WireMock and we have access to WireMock Cloud for create a WireMock mapping file for our OAS 3 Swaggers. Experience with WireMock Cloud OAS to Mapping For example, in our Swaggers we have an endpoint

POST /documents

that is used to upload a document. In the Swagger we have multiple responses defined: 200, 400, 401, 403, 422, 500, 502, 503, 504. I went ahead and processed that Swagger and downloaded the WireMock mapping file. In looking at the mapping file I see that it creates mappings for all of our response definitions for each endpoint. In that mapping file for uploading a document (

POST /documents

) I see a group at the top of the file for: • 200 • 401 • 403 As the WireMock documentation shows, the default priority if none is specified is “5”. Further down the file (in this order) I see the mappings for the following: • 400 - priority 8 • 422 - priority 9 • 500 - priority 10 • 502 - priority 10 • 503 - priority 10 • 504 - priority 10 Auto-Generation Issue So my issue with the auto-generated file is that when I call this created mapping file I would expect to get the 200 response. But the WireMock rules for matching are: • Highest Priority (lowest #) • If the same priorities, the last physical definition read in the file So in this case I receive a 403 as the response. To get the 200 response I want, I need to define a priority higher than 5 (1-4) for that mapping. So my questions for the WireMock team would be: • Is there any reason to generate mappings for the 4xx or 5xx responses? Normally these would only come back because of a business logic rule failure or server failure. ◦ I could see a general 404 as a low-priority global match for GETs • If there is a reason to generate all of the response codes, then maybe have settings where I can ◦ Have the 2xx entries set to a priority I specify (like 1) ◦ Explain the reasoning for the priorities shown above (some 4xx are default, 400 is a 8, and 422 a 9). ◦ Is there a way I could add a header or path parameter specifically for WireMock to trigger a specific response mapping? ▪︎ Like header/path parameter of “wiremock-response-code” set to some value like 400, 422, 501, etc. • Another separate option for generation would be to ignore any “server” definitions in the OAS file. That server context-path was added to my defined context-path. Thanks for any/all help - Brian

@Tom some comments of the new features in WireMock Cloud beta for the new interactive design — well done and exciting. I was looking to bring over an API and post-Demo reality hit. 🙂 We use SwaggerHub for designing our OAS3 contracts and make huge use of $ref to URL references. See Using $ref (swagger.io) A typical contracts is built from a hierachy of contracts. For example for our Customers Modality: • Domain: ConsistentContracts ◦ Contains shared responses, parameters, headers, and schemas • Domain: Customer Data Model ◦ Schemas • Domain: Customer Master Domain ◦ Built from all references to the first two domains plus additional responses, parameters, request bodies, examples, and schemas • API - Customer Master ◦ Endpoint definitions with references to the above Domains Right now when I want to use the new WireMock Cloud feature to generate a WireMock from an OAS 3 contracts, I export a resolved API contract (such as the API - Customer Master referenced above) and then copy/paste that into Postman for the WireMock generation. I’m trying to see a way to use your new Cloud OAS features but not need to move stuff back to 3-4 other files. Any suggestions or have you looked at that scenario? SwaggerHub has full APIs to read/write to those APIs/Domains.