Hi, When I’m trying to execute the test “WireMockContainerExtensionTest -> testJSONBodyTransformer”, I get an error:

...
Caused by: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Could not create/start container
	at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.tryStart(GenericContainer.java:553)
	at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.lambda$doStart$0(GenericContainer.java:344)
	at org.rnorth.ducttape.unreliables.Unreliables.retryUntilSuccess(Unreliables.java:81)
	... 23 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Wait strategy failed. Container exited with code 1
	at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.tryStart(GenericContainer.java:523)
	... 25 more
Caused by: org.testcontainers.containers.ContainerLaunchException: Timed out waiting for URL to be accessible (<http://localhost:49189/__admin/mappings> should return HTTP [200])
	at org.testcontainers.containers.wait.strategy.HttpWaitStrategy.waitUntilReady(HttpWaitStrategy.java:320)
	at org.testcontainers.containers.wait.strategy.AbstractWaitStrategy.waitUntilReady(AbstractWaitStrategy.java:52)
	at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.waitUntilContainerStarted(GenericContainer.java:964)
	at org.testcontainers.containers.GenericContainer.tryStart(GenericContainer.java:490)
	... 25 more
...

It seems that the container is failing. The container logs look like this:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.ninecookies.wiremock.extensions.JsonBodyTransformer
	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
	at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.ExtensionLoader$3.apply(ExtensionLoader.java:71)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.ExtensionLoader$3.apply(ExtensionLoader.java:67)
	at wiremock.com.google.common.collect.Iterators$6.transform(Iterators.java:829)
	at wiremock.com.google.common.collect.TransformedIterator.next(TransformedIterator.java:52)
	at wiremock.com.google.common.collect.TransformedIterator.next(TransformedIterator.java:52)
	at wiremock.com.google.common.collect.Maps.uniqueIndex(Maps.java:1391)
	at wiremock.com.google.common.collect.Maps.uniqueIndex(Maps.java:1353)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.ExtensionLoader.asMap(ExtensionLoader.java:40)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.ExtensionLoader.loadExtension(ExtensionLoader.java:32)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.ExtensionLoader.load(ExtensionLoader.java:36)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.CommandLineOptions.buildExtensions(CommandLineOptions.java:378)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.CommandLineOptions.<init>(CommandLineOptions.java:369)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner.run(WireMockServerRunner.java:49)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner.main(WireMockServerRunner.java:133)

Maybe I’m doing something wrong? To be honest, I’m not sure how this is working and what is expected…

Hi Everyone. I am trying to implement persistent storage just to save all the mappings. Also I would like to store any mapping that are being created through API. Can you please show some lights on this

FYI @Julian Michelmann @Nikita Karpuk Releasing the new version of https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-testcontainers-java with all recent patches. Sorry for not including the API simplification in this patch, got distracted last weekend

Hi, I got a requirement to filter JSON response from a big JSON file. Based on the request query parameter I want to match JSON path in the big body file and retrieve it. Is there any way to achieve it please?

I’ve posted some comments on how we might improve extensions in 3.x and some design options. Would appreciate thoughts on https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/1512#issuecomment-1591286748 and below comments.

Hi @Tom, where do we stand with the Maven Central structure at the moment? Did you reserve

org.wiremock

at some point, or is it up for grabs? I think it would be nice to document the structure for the package group and allow other contributors like @Dirk Bolte to release there

Hi, I'm trying to include and use the WireMock TestContainers Java module in a gradle project, but I don't seem to be able to make Gradle download it. I've added it as

testImplementation 'org.wiremock.integrations.testcontainers:wiremock-testcontainers-module:1.0-alpha-5'

but I'm not sure if this is correct, if the module is available at all to use it like this, or I need more configuration. I must be missing some crucial information about the Java module, so forgive me if I'm asking something very trivial. 🙂

FYI https://github.com/wiremock/community/issues/44 on the backlog - new Maven Central location for all components within the

wiremock

GitHub org

This beast is about ready to drop I reckon: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pull/2238 @Oleg Nenashev any final thoughts before I land it?

<!channel> join us in 40 minutes to discuss WireMock 3 and all the upcoming changes https://www.linkedin.com/events/wiremock3andbeyond-withtomakehu7079397520476401664

WireMock Docker integration tests, powered by Testcontainers https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-docker/pull/67

I made use of the new Events of version

3.0.0-beta-11

in the state extension. A PR is available at: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-extension-state/pull/4 for you to give feedback and see it in use. Some things I stumbled upon: • I could only get response templating to work when both

templatingEnabled

and

globalTemplating

was set to

true

. • For one functionality I had in mind it would be great if a request gets a unique ID . What do you think? • I'm currently at 4 classes I have to add for the whole set. It hardly makes sense to register them in isolation, so I wonder whether we can add a "collection" extension which can register multiple events + extensions in one shot (similar to what is already done with

TemplateHelperProviderExtension

. I can provide an proposal + PR if this something you see as beneficial

Interesting discussion about WireMock restructuring: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/2266 FYI @Tom we briefly talked about it during WireMock 3 planning, and I think it would be a good change for 3.0 or, most likely, for a later release

@Oleg Nenashev are we keeping track of new documentation needed for these DSL changes we're merging?

@Tom WDYT about cutting a new beta release of WireMock? I think we have plenty of the things integrated, including a few bugfixes

Possibly a couple more PRs we could merge beforehand? I’m going to be working with Uri all day today, but I’ll try to take a look.

Yes, we can land a few more bits

@Tom if you have some time, I would suggest the following PRs with new API for review: • https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pull/2283 • https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pull/2263 • https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pull/1981 Not a big deal if it goes into the next release IMHO, the versions are cheap

@Tom I didn't get to switching the Testcontainers module to Gradle. AFAICT the Maven release just requires a Maven GPG plugin in the build if you have your credentials configured in Maven settings. So you can try doing so, or I can prepare proper Maven Central release automation in about in ~2 weeks

while working with the new extensions more, had issues, especially in the CI systems, that somehow feels like

afterComplete

are not processed timely. Can it happen that these events are processed after the response was sent and thus even after the next request is matched?

@Tom going forward, would it make sense to merge WireMock and WireMock Standalone into a single artifact and distinguish them by a classifier? Not sure it is very helpful from the DevX perspective, but definitely makes it more convenient for scanning tools

https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/commit/166c3b3586c57aece86a1b5744a1cb2d19c6f690 also breaks some of the previous guidelines, because it moves the location on the

main()

method. I will register it as a breaking change

Hi All , Can we have any solution in wiremock to pass the request from one API to another API and return the customised response to client from wire mock? pls help here if any on know the solution

Hi Team, We are still using wiremock-studio jar. Is it possible to let us know the available cli parameters. I could not find relevant documentation on open source. Pls help

Hi there. It's time to close this issue. @Dirk Bolte thank you for the great work.

Another topic. Now wiremock supports

bodyFileName

feature for response. What about to implement the same for request? Maybe I didn't read the docs well?

Would appreciate feedback about Testcontainers module API patches: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-testcontainers-java/pull/66, https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-testcontainers-java/pull/67. Esp CC @Nikita Karpuk @Eric Deandrea for the first one

@Tom I also wonder whether we could fix the terminology to avoid confusion, e.g. from the convo with @Nikita Karpuk: • The "extension" -means a single extension point implementation, so a single class name (https://wiremock.org/docs/extending-wiremock/). And extension always means a single class • JAR files may include a number of extensions, and all these extensions will be automatically loaded in WireMock 3. To avoid possible confusion, we could call is a "WireMock plugin"

@Tom What if we included https://github.com/jenkinsci/lib-access-modifier/ after 3.0 so that we'd get tooling for enforcing annotation checks right away? I guess it can be shaded with the only dep. For 3.0 I am just adding a quick annotation that can be later replaced