WireMock

set the channel description: Anything about WireMock on .NET, including the <http://WireMock.Net|WireMock.Net> project

:wave: <@U059H2UMUUS>, nice to meet here! I believe <@U053QJ8NGNS> would be interested to join too :slightly_smiling_face:

Just for the notes:

• As we discussed, there is a pending WireMock for .NET solutions page pull request. Reviews would be appreciated!
    ◦ <https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org/pull/110>
• I created the <#C059VH8ULQZ|spec> channel to discuss all bits specifications, including the configuration files and admin REST APIs. Ideally, it would be great to align WireMock implementations overtime though the specs need to be extensible
    ◦ <https://github.com/wiremock/ecosystem/issues/3>
    ◦ <https://github.com/wiremock/ecosystem/issues/4>
• I will create a repository/ticket for a Testcontainers .NET Module for WireMock. As we discussed, the intent would be to have a module that supports both WireMock and <http://WireMock.Net|WireMock.Net> server implementations, and it could help us to work together on the configuration and API spec alignment in future server versions


I did have a look at Testcontainers and this looks indeed very useful.
About : "Testcontainers .NET Module", I think it's very useful to create a WireMock package, however, maybe for the time being, for the first idea, it's easier to create a version for <http://WireMock.Net|WireMock.Net> first (<http://Testcontainers.WireMock.Net|Testcontainers.WireMock.Net> NuGet) and after that create the java version (Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet ) and when the 2 specs are aligned, the Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet would support both.

Or create Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet and use specific builder methods to define the java or the .net version

I would rather create a single module that has two container definitions and some shared utility classes and interfaces where we can start generalizing the things

We don't have to commit to binary compatibility in the beginning, and I think this approach could provide us with an excellent boilerplate. With some luck and effort we could even end up in the compatibility layer that could be later detached into a separate library so that <http://WireMock.NET|WireMock.NET> could include it

I’m definitely interested in what’s going on in the WireMock .NET space so thanks for adding me! I’ll do what I can to help and support.

<@U059H2UMUUS> FYI <https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/pull/944> for the Slack link

Looking at the project setup at the moment. Will likely start from a single .NET Framework configuration for now. <@U059H2UMUUS> what is your MVS preference at the moment?

I mean the MVS Solution, sorry. Forgot the terminology

Still don't know what you mean :thinking_face:

NVM. I will start from the PR and some questions there

I noticed the GraphQL extension for WireMock which can be used to verify if a body conforms to a specific GraphQL query.
I want to build the same logic in <http://WireMock.Net|WireMock.Net> by using HotChocolate. I've already created some simple example console app for now, and I will check if this can be added easily to <http://WireMock.Net|WireMock.Net> ...

image.png

I've a first version working.

When using a mapping in WireMock-Net like:

```"Body": {
                "Matcher": {
                    "Name": "GraphQLMatcher",
                    "Pattern": "\r\n  input MessageInput {\r\n    content: String\r\n    author: String\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  type Message {\r\n    id: ID!\r\n    content: String\r\n    author: String\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  type Mutation {\r\n    createMessage(input: MessageInput): Message\r\n    updateMessage(id: ID!, input: MessageInput): Message\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  type Query {\r\n   greeting:String\r\n   students:[Student]\r\n   studentById(id:ID!):Student\r\n  }\r\n\r\n  type Student {\r\n   id:ID!\r\n   firstName:String\r\n   lastName:String\r\n   fullName:String \r\n  }"
                }
            }```
I can send a real GraphQL request (using postman) to WireMock-Net:

And this is matched correctly using that schema defined in the mapping above.

Version 1.5.31 is released with GraphQL support.

<https://www.nuget.org/packages/WireMock.Net> passed 10 million downloads ;-)

Congratulations, Stef, that’s an amazing milestone to reach. Thank you once again, also on behalf of all users of RestAssured .Net (which is tested using WireMock .Net on every build as you know) for all the time and effort you put into the library.

I’ll keep recommending WireMock .Net wherever I can :) Cheers!

<@U059H2UMUUS> Hi! Do you consider this chat or Gitter as an official channel at the moment? I guess the latter one