set the channel description: Anything about WireMock on .NET, including the WireMock.Net project

👋 @Stef Heyenrath, nice to meet here! I believe @Bas Dijkstra would be interested to join too 🙂

Hello all !

Just for the notes: • As we discussed, there is a pending WireMock for .NET solutions page pull request. Reviews would be appreciated! ◦ https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org/pull/110 • I created the #spec channel to discuss all bits specifications, including the configuration files and admin REST APIs. Ideally, it would be great to align WireMock implementations overtime though the specs need to be extensible ◦ https://github.com/wiremock/ecosystem/issues/3 ◦ https://github.com/wiremock/ecosystem/issues/4 • I will create a repository/ticket for a Testcontainers .NET Module for WireMock. As we discussed, the intent would be to have a module that supports both WireMock and WireMock.Net server implementations, and it could help us to work together on the configuration and API spec alignment in future server versions

I did have a look at Testcontainers and this looks indeed very useful. About : "Testcontainers .NET Module", I think it's very useful to create a WireMock package, however, maybe for the time being, for the first idea, it's easier to create a version for WireMock.Net first (Testcontainers.WireMock.Net NuGet) and after that create the java version (Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet ) and when the 2 specs are aligned, the Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet would support both. Or create Testcontainers.WireMock NuGet and use specific builder methods to define the java or the .net version

I’m definitely interested in what’s going on in the WireMock .NET space so thanks for adding me! I’ll do what I can to help and support.

@Stef Heyenrath FYI https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/pull/944 for the Slack link