@Tom would it be possible for an app to send http to wiremock while https is set as proxyBaseUrl to forward https connection? I wonder the corporate proxyVia cannot be https in this case as wiremock sets something like export http_proxy instead of https_proxy

hi

i want to install and run wiremock studio in win10 may anyone help me plz?

Hi, Could you help please. I use wiremock-standalone in auto tests and sometime I have error. It is fluky and I can not reproduce it each time. What could it be? PS The tests are executed in a single thread Java 17 wiremock-standalone 3.3.1

[ERROR] test.TestGetProductListGet.testGetProductListXMLForCI(EventTypesForTestScenarios)[3]  Time elapsed: 0.344 s  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.Throwable: Test case exception: [engine:junit-platform-suite]/[suite:test.PolygonSuite]/[engine:junit-jupiter]/[class:test.TestGetProductListGet]/[test-template:testGetProductListXMLForCI(test.EventTypesForTestScenarios)]/[test-template-invocation:#3]
	Suppressed: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.JsonException: {
  "errors" : [ {
    "code" : 10,
    "source" : {
      "pointer" : "/"
    },
    "title" : "Error parsing JSON",
    "detail" : "Cannot construct instance of `com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Errors` (although at least one Creator exists): no int/Int-argument constructor/factory method to deserialize from Number value (404)"
  } ]
}

Hello WireMock Team, I am part of a project team currently involved in migrating a microservice from Node.js to Java. A key objective of our project is to ensure complete parity in API requests and responses, as we have external clients interfacing with our system. To achieve this, we have devised a specific setup for recording both the Node.js application’s requests/responses and the requests/responses from the external API the application uses. These recordings are intended to be replayed against our new Java implementation for a comprehensive comparison of responses. Attached below is a diagram illustrating our setup. Notably, the WireMock instance, deployed as a sidecar in the same Kubernetes pod as our Node.js application, is central to this strategy. We plan to deploy this configuration in a production environment to capture a full day’s worth of traffic. Our current load is approximately 60,000 calls per day. Given that we have not previously utilized WireMock proxy under such production traffic conditions, we are reaching out to gather insights and opinions on whether WireMock can reliably handle this volume of traffic. Any advice, suggestions, or considerations you could provide would be invaluable to us.

Hi, just curious of any breaking changes to the JSON format between 2.x and 3.x. Not sure if there’s any, can’t seem to find any according to the GitHub project section but just wanted to double check. Aware of breaking changes within the java package but my customers only interface via JSON

I have the following wiremock JSON mapping

{
  "mappings": [
    {
      "name": "get-credit-report-fail",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "urlPathPattern": "/pvt/v1/bureau/pan-number",
        "queryParameters": {
          "uuid": {
            "matches": ".*crs-fail"
          }
        }
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 500
      }
    },
    {
      "name": "get-credit-report-success",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "urlPathPattern": "/pvt/v1/bureau/pan-number"
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 200,
        "jsonBody": {
          "success": true,
          "data": {
            "panNumber": "ABCDE1234F",
            "vendor": "EQUIFAX"
          },
          "status_code": 200
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

When I try to match it with curl

curl --location 'localhost:8080/pvt/v1/bureau/pan-number?uuid=crs-fail'

it gives the below response

{
  "success": true,
  "data": {
    "panNumber": "ABCDE1234F",
    "vendor": "EQUIFAX"
  },
  "status_code": 200
}

instead of 500 error

Hi. Does anybody know how to use wiremock-grpc-extension as server streaming? I believe we can do so, because ExampleServices.proto has server streaming rpc method. I have a .proto file like below.

message testRequest {
  string id = 1;
}
message testResponse {
  oneof Content {
    uint32 status = 1;
    string result = 2;
    string log    = 3;
  }
}
service TestService {
  rpc Test(testRequest) returns (stream testResponse) {}
}

Hi, can anybody help me with how to do stubbing for the GRPC service having google.protobuf.Any in request and response , i am using standalone jars

question on wiremock standalone.. some classes in 2.35.0 and 2.35.1 are recognized as having a bytecode of 53 (aka java9) and websphere prevents it from running as its running on java8 itself.. Is it intended for the wiremock standalone jre8 to have classes not bytecoded with 52? incriminated classes are JDK9ServerALPNProcessor and JDK9ClientALPNProcessor

whereas this seems to pose no problem on tomcat (or embedded tomcat), websphere won't take it..

the fact that leaves me perplexed is that technically it's an all in one, so i don't understand how different classes are recognized by the IDE and the application server alike as having different bytecode

Is there a way I can print log statements to the standalone wiremock console? I don't want to use the Notifier in the admin api

unable to start wiremock due to the following error:

2023-11-18 11:54:17.196 Verbose logging enabled
Exception in thread "main" wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.UnrecognizedPropertyException: Unrecognized field "mappings" (class com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.stubbing.StubMapping), not marked as ignorable (10 known properties: "response", "requiredScenarioState", "priority", "persistent", "id", "postServeActions", "request", "newScenarioState", "uuid", "scenarioName"])
 at [Source: {
    "mappings": [
        {
            "name": "get-cif",
            "request": {
                "method": "POST",
                "urlPathPattern": "/cif"
            },
            "response": {
                "status": 200,
                "jsonBody": {
                    "success": true,
                    "data": {
                        "cifNumber": "1234567890"
                    },
                    "status_code": 200
                }
            }
        }
    ]
}
; line: 2, column: 18] (through reference chain: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.stubbing.StubMapping["mappings"])
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.UnrecognizedPropertyException.from(UnrecognizedPropertyException.java:51)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext.reportUnknownProperty(DeserializationContext.java:836)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.std.StdDeserializer.handleUnknownProperty(StdDeserializer.java:1045)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBase.handleUnknownProperty(BeanDeserializerBase.java:1352)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializerBase.handleUnknownVanilla(BeanDeserializerBase.java:1330)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.vanillaDeserialize(BeanDeserializer.java:262)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.deserialize(BeanDeserializer.java:125)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readMapAndClose(ObjectMapper.java:3702)
        at wiremock.com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:2714)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Json.read(Json.java:39)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.stubbing.StubMapping.buildFrom(StubMapping.java:69)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.JsonFileMappingsSource.loadMappingsInto(JsonFileMappingsSource.java:79)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.core.WireMockApp.loadMappingsUsing(WireMockApp.java:152)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.core.WireMockApp.loadDefaultMappings(WireMockApp.java:148)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.core.WireMockApp.<init>(WireMockApp.java:86)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.<init>(WireMockServer.java:69)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner.run(WireMockServerRunner.java:65)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner.main(WireMockServerRunner.java:113)

Hi folks, I'm planning a feature for the WireMocha IntelliJ plugin that could, at least to a certain extent, convert Java

WireMock.stubFor(...)

calls into the JSON stub mapping format. But, before diving into that, I'd like to ask the community how common is the need for converting either individual

stubFor(...)

calls, or migrating an entire project of them from Java to the JSON DSL. If anyone has had such experience, what challenges did you face during that conversion/migration? Any feedback is greatly welcome.

Hello Beautiful people, I am kind of newbie with Wiremock and would like to play a bit with Transformers, building my own extension. I was trying to modify test-extension and re-build the jar. Could you give me some hints how this can be done?

Newby here! I am writing my second JSON mapping and I need to know how to validate each element of an array. My first one was easy and working. Must have both keys ("key1" & "key2") and the value can be anything (could also have an example for a specific value for a key).

"myArray": [
  {
    "Key1": "AnyValue",
    "Key2": "AnyValue"
  },
  {
    "Key1": "AnyValue",
    "Key2": "AnyValue"
  },
  {
    "Key1": "AnyValue"
  }
]

In my example, the first two elements are valid but not the third one.

Hey Wiremock fam, is there a way to do regex mapping on Headers when using Wiremock? Trying to filter based on whether incoming header contains a specific string value or not. Does just using

contains

work?

Hi all, getting this error while using wiremock-grpc-extension standalone jar for the response type of the google.protobuf.Any

Exception in thread "grpc-default-executor-2" wiremock.com.google.protobuf.InvalidProtocolBufferException: Missing type url when parsing: {"greeting":"Hello Duis"}
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.mergeAny(JsonFormat.java:1504)
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.access$2000(JsonFormat.java:1276)
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl$1.merge(JsonFormat.java:1343)
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.merge(JsonFormat.java:1432)
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.merge(JsonFormat.java:1317)
        at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$Parser.merge(JsonFormat.java:449)
        at org.wiremock.grpc.internal.JsonMessageUtils.lambda$toMessage$1(JsonMessageUtils.java:36)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Exceptions.uncheck(Exceptions.java:72)
        at org.wiremock.grpc.internal.JsonMessageUtils.toMessage(JsonMessageUtils.java:36)
        at org.wiremock.grpc.internal.UnaryServerCallHandler.lambda$invoke$0(UnaryServerCallHandler.java:92)
        at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.AbstractRequestHandler.handle(AbstractRequestHandler.java:101)
        at org.wiremock.grpc.internal.UnaryServerCallHandler.invoke(UnaryServerCallHandler.java:60)
        at org.wiremock.grpc.internal.UnaryServerCallHandler.invoke(UnaryServerCallHandler.java:31)
        at wiremock.grpc.io.grpc.stub.ServerCalls$UnaryServerCallHandler$UnaryServerCallListener.onHalfClose(ServerCalls.java:182)
        at wiremock.grpc.io.grpc.internal.ServerCallImpl$ServerStreamListenerImpl.halfClosed(ServerCallImpl.java:351)
        at wiremock.grpc.io.grpc.internal.ServerImpl$JumpToApplicationThreadServerStreamListener$1HalfClosed.runInContext(ServerImpl.java:860)
        at wiremock.grpc.io.grpc.internal.ContextRunnable.run(ContextRunnable.java:37)
        at wiremock.grpc.io.grpc.internal.SerializingExecutor.run(SerializingExecutor.java:133)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
        at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
        at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

Hello WireMock Community, I'm currently working on a project where I'm trying to use a database as the primary source for storing mappings and files, rather than relying on the filesystem. I've successfully managed to store mappings by implementing the 'MappingSource' interface. However, I'm encountering some challenges with storing files in the database. I came across the 'FileSource' interface, which seems like it should meet my needs. But upon delving into the code, I discovered dependencies related to 'BlobStoreFileSource' that have added to my confusion. Could anyone please provide some guidance or insights on how to effectively source files from a database using WireMock? Any advice or pointers to relevant documentation or examples would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help!

Hi Team, We are planning to use Wiremock in nginx and kubernetes. Could you please share the location for latest official docker image.

Hello everyone, I am looking for some hints on how to transform (on the fly) responses that WireMock is getting from a service it is proxy-ing to. My use case: I would like to have WireMock in proxy mode and also to transform specific responses. Is this doable?

Hi! After Spring Boot 3.2 upgrade WireMock 3.3.1 no longer works with JUnit 4.13.2:

java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class org.eclipse.jetty.http2.server.HttpChannelOverHTTP2 has interface org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel as super class

Stacktrace in the thread.

Hello @everyone May i know what is wrong with the following xpath? It does not match, while its working in the online tool "matchesXPath": "//Code[text()='Test'] or (count(//Ref)>0 and //Ref[not(starts-with(text(), 'M'))])" } <Request <Code>Test</Code> </Request>

Hey all, i'm trying to setup test environment that mirrors what a peer implemented however, i'm not able to get the

/__admin/webapp

web interface to work. When running the latest standalone and docker instance, i'm getting a 404 not found. I did enabled

-enabled-browser

also but its not working. Any tips?

Hey guys is it possible to match a stub with current date? For example I have { "request": { "method": "POST", "url": "/xyz/xyz", "bodyPatterns": [ { "matchesJsonPath": CURRENT DATE (also current date - 1 year or + 1 year) }] } Would matching the current date be possible in this case?

Hi In our project we were using version 2.33.2 and as tech refresh we upgraded our version to 3.3.1 We have a wiremock pod that has 4 container in it. After upgrade the behavior has changed. While running the performance test, it start throttling and causing 499 errors. I resolve the issue increasing the number of container from 4 to 10 but this is like a work around. I tried couple of parameters like: Previous setup: --async-response-enabled=true --async-response-threads=100 --container-threads=500 --disable-request-logging --no-request-journal after upgrade added params: --async-response-enabled=true --async-response-threads=100 Any helpful suggestions that I can resolve this throttling issue?

Hello everyone. When I match a variable in a request, can I refer to that variable in a webhook response? All the examples use originalRequest in the webhook template. Here's an example, where I'd like to capture part of the path as the variable "tn" and then refer to it in the JSON I send via the webhook extension...but that doesn't work:

{
  "mappings": [
    {
      "request": {
        "method": "DELETE",
        "urlPathTemplate": "/path/{tn}",
        "pathParameters": {
          "tn": {
            "matches": "[0-9]+"
          }
        }
      },
      "serveEventListeners": [
        {
          "name": "webhook",
          "parameters": {
            "method": "POST",
            "url": "/webhook/path",
            "headers": {
              "Content-Type": "application/json"
            },
            "body": "{\"tn\":\"{{tn}}\",\"timestamp\":\"{{now}}\"}}"
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

If the request is the only variable passed into the webhook templating system, then I guess I'm hoping there's something like

originalRequest.parameters

that I can refer to in order to get at that variable. (btw I'm aware that I can get at a path element via

originalRequest.path.[#]

but I that's somewhat fragile and hard for others to follow.) Thanks in advance for any help on this!

Hello everyone, I'm working on some wiremock project using Scala and i'm now creating wiremock instance in my scala code and make it act as Browser Proxy , it works fine when i use it with firefox and http site(that set proxy to localhost:8080) but when it comes to https (of the same site) it does not work , firefox say

NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_HOST

, but if i use wiremock standalone (.jar file) and running as browser proxy everything works perfectly , Appreciate for your guidance / clue , thx a lot below is my scala code (Not work with https site )

w = new WireMockServer(op.httpsPort(8443)
          .caKeystoreType("jks")
          .trustAllProxyTargets(false)
          .caKeystorePath("/Users/oz4899/.wiremock/ca-keystore.jks")
          .enableBrowserProxying(true)
          .notifier(new ConsoleNotifier(true)))
        w.start()

below is command that i used to run standalone (work fines)

java -jar wiremock-standalone-3.3.1.jar --enable-browser-proxying --port 8080 --verbose

Hello everyone, I'm working with

wiremock

as part of a Java/Spring Boot project, and when trying to upgrade to the latest version, we have found 2 different wiremock maven dependencies. So maybe you can help me understand the difference between

wiremock

and

wiremock-standalone

jars ? I have run

mvn dependency:tree

to see the differences: Having

wiremock-standalone

in pom.xml

[INFO] +- org.wiremock:wiremock-standalone:jar:3.3.1:test

Having `wiremock `in pom.xml :

[INFO] +- org.wiremock:wiremock:jar:3.3.1:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  +- org.eclipse.jetty.toolchain:jetty-jakarta-servlet-api:jar:5.0.2:test
[INFO] |  |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-io:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlets:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-util:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-xml:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-proxy:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-client:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-server:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-common:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  |     \- org.eclipse.jetty.http2:http2-hpack:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-alpn-server:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-alpn-java-server:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-alpn-java-client:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-alpn-client:jar:11.0.18:test
[INFO] |  +- com.google.guava:guava:jar:32.1.3-jre:test
[INFO] |  |  +- com.google.guava:failureaccess:jar:1.0.1:test
[INFO] |  |  +- com.google.guava:listenablefuture:jar:9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava:test
[INFO] |  |  +- org.checkerframework:checker-qual:jar:3.37.0:test
[INFO] |  |  +- com.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations:jar:2.21.1:test
[INFO] |  |  \- com.google.j2objc:j2objc-annotations:jar:2.8:test
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.httpcomponents.client5:httpclient5:jar:5.2.1:test
[INFO] |  |  +- org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5:jar:5.2:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5-h2:jar:5.2:test
[INFO] |  +- org.xmlunit:xmlunit-core:jar:2.9.1:test
[INFO] |  |  \- jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api:jar:2.3.3:test
[INFO] |  |     \- jakarta.activation:jakarta.activation-api:jar:1.2.2:test
[INFO] |  +- org.xmlunit:xmlunit-legacy:jar:2.9.1:test
[INFO] |  +- org.xmlunit:xmlunit-placeholders:jar:2.9.1:test
[INFO] |  +- net.javacrumbs.json-unit:json-unit-core:jar:2.38.0:test
[INFO] |  |  \- org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:jar:2.2:test
[INFO] |  |     \- org.hamcrest:hamcrest:jar:2.2:test
[INFO] |  +- com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path:jar:2.8.0:test
[INFO] |  |  \- net.minidev:json-smart:jar:2.4.10:test
[INFO] |  |     \- net.minidev:accessors-smart:jar:2.4.9:test
[INFO] |  +- org.ow2.asm:asm:jar:9.6:test
[INFO] |  +- net.sf.jopt-simple:jopt-simple:jar:5.0.4:test
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:jar:3.13.0:test
[INFO] |  +- com.github.jknack:handlebars:jar:4.3.1:test
[INFO] |  +- com.github.jknack:handlebars-helpers:jar:4.3.1:test
[INFO] |  +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.5:test
[INFO] |  +- commons-io:commons-io:jar:2.15.0:test
[INFO] |  \- com.networknt:json-schema-validator:jar:1.0.87:test
[INFO] |     +- com.ethlo.time:itu:jar:1.7.0:test
[INFO] |     \- com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml:jar:2.16.0:test
[INFO] |        \- org.yaml:snakeyaml:jar:2.2:test

When running my unit tests with

wiremock-standalone

, I don't get verbose logs, but when running them with with `wiremock `I get the following logs:

[INFO] --- surefire:3.0.0-M3:test (default-test) @ *** ---
[INFO] Running ***
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server - jetty-11.0.18; built: 2023-10-27T02:14:36.036Z; git: 5a9a771a9fbcb9d36993630850f612581b78c13f; jvm 11.0.21+9-LTS
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler - Started o.e.j.s.ServletContextHandler@6d7d0946{/__admin,null,AVAILABLE}
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.ROOT - RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.StubRequestHandler. Normalized mapped under returned 'null'
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler - Started o.e.j.s.ServletContextHandler@3054cdd3{/,null,AVAILABLE}
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector - Started NetworkTrafficServerConnector@2fd409c1{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1, h2c)}{0.0.0.0:39051}
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server - Started Server@9fd5dd0{STARTING}[11.0.18,sto=1000] @10755ms
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server - Stopped Server@9fd5dd0{STOPPING}[11.0.18,sto=1000]
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server - Shutdown Server@9fd5dd0{STOPPING}[11.0.18,sto=1000]
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector - Stopped NetworkTrafficServerConnector@2fd409c1{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1, h2c)}{0.0.0.0:0}
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler - Stopped o.e.j.s.ServletContextHandler@3054cdd3{/,null,STOPPED}
[main] INFO org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler - Stopped o.e.j.s.ServletContextHandler@6d7d0946{/__admin,null,STOPPED}
[INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.178 s - in ***

And when adding Spring Boot BOM (just an example) I get errors when running my UT with

wiremock

, but no errors with

wiremock-standalone

Sample of errors with Spring boot BOM (2.7.18)

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: jakarta/servlet/DispatcherType
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: jakarta.servlet.DispatcherType

Thank you!