Hi Everyone , just a quick question - Is it possible to import OpenAPI spec to wiremock opensource other than using wiremock cloud ? is there any way we can have this feature added as part of wiremock opensource ?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to call via Wiremock an external endpoint protected by mutual authentication; here the config:

wireMockConfiguration = options()
                        .disableRequestJournal()
                        .usingFilesUnderDirectory(rootFolder)
                        .port(Integer.parseInt(getProperty("port")))
                        .adminAuthenticator(getAdminAuthenticator())
                        .jettyAcceptors(Integer.parseInt(getPropertyOrDefault("acceptor.threads", DEFAULT_ACCEPTOR_THREADS)))
                        .keystorePath(getProperty("keystore.path"))
                        .keystorePassword(getProperty("keystore.password"))
                        .trustStorePath(getProperty("truststore.path"))
                        .trustStorePassword(getProperty("truststore.password"))
                        .extensions(
                                new AdminRequestLoggingFilter(),
                                new ServiceRequestLoggingFilter(),
                                new ServiceResponseLoggingFilter(),
                                new ResponseTemplateTransformer(true));

Here the error:

SL failure trying to make a proxied request from WireMock to ...
PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target

My keystore contains my private cert and the truststore contains the server certificate (everything ok with curl). Is there something missing? Thanks Alessandro

Do the

basicAuth

keys support regex matching? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75614289/wiremock-json-template-basicauth-and-doesnotmatch-not-working I ran this locally and was getting the same error, even with switching to

basicAuthCredentials

.

Hello, I was trying to run Wiremock studio from my local machine. When i launch it from window it throws below error. Could somebody help me if i am missing anything.:

how can i pass a xml file in the response using .withPostServeAction

i am setting up a new project. Using

"org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-contract-stub-runner"

But I am getting the following error and not sure why. Any help ?

Request was not matched
                                               =======================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Closest stub                                             | Request                                                  |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           |
GET                                                        | GET
/ldap_directory_items/v2/group_members?key=key&name=APP-O  | /ldap_directory_items/v2/group_members?key=key&name=APP-O
AUTH2-ABCD&size=100000                                     | AUTH2-ABCD&size=100000
                                                           |
                                                           |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi! I am trying to use the form data of a request in the response. The request body looks like this

flag1[enabled]=true&transfer[destination]=target_account&metadata[userId]=1-2-3-4&metadata[sessionId]=a-b-c

I am having a hard time to use the values in the response. I am parsing the form via

{{formData request.body 'params' urlDecode=true}}

and I can see the values fine when doing

{{#each params}}
{{@index}} - {{@key}} - {{this}}
{{/each}}

But I cannot access the individual fields, no matter what I try, e.g.,

{{"metadata[userId]"}}
{{metadata\[userId\]}}
{{metadata.userId}}

My Google-fu also failed me 😕

On another note: I am using some

assign

and a

formData

expressions at the top of my response (referenced via

bodyFileName

) and it seems that they get replaced by an empty line, i.e., I have a few empty lines before my JSON response body starts. For now I just cram everything in one line and start the JSON object there, too, but it is really unreadable 😕

{{#assign 'a'}}...{{/assign}}{{#assign 'b'}}...{{/assign}}{{formData ...}}{
  "id": ...
...
}

Is there a better way to suppress the empty lines in this case?

I am trying to mock two different requests to the same endpoint. One mock is set up like this

"request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "urlPattern": "/store|/v2/store",
        "queryParameters": {
          "client": {
            "matches": "STORE-ABC-.+"
          },
...
          }
        }

and the second looks like this

"request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "urlPattern": "/store|/v2/store",
        "queryParameters": {
          "client": {
            "matches": "STORE-123-.+"
          },
...
        }
      },

Both have additional but the same query parameters to match. Both also have different body patterns to match. When I send this request (from WireMock's log)

POST /v2/store?client=STORE-123-12345&user=userId&realm=realm&key=sessionId

I see that WireMock only tries the other request (STORE-ABC) but fails because it cannot match some parts of the body patterns of STORE-ABC, even though STORE-123 would match. So I wonder if WireMock even tries the STORE-123 mock because I cannot see it in the log. More curiosly, at the very end I get a "closest stub" that is a completely different stub where of course neither URL nor body match; how come it shows this, and not for example the stubs it tried?

Can I disable a mapping without removing the file from the

mappings

folder, e.g., by adding a

disabled: true

field or so? 🤔

I wonder if I can set some values in the stub to use as template values in the response. For example, let's say I have a generic response for a

DELETE

endpoint, and I have a response

bodyFileName

that has something like

{
  "message": "Deleted {{arguments.count}} items"
}

And then I would have a stub like this

{
  "request": ...,
  "response": {
    "bodyFileName": ...,
    "arguments": {
      "count": 1
    }
...
}

Or can I use the

metadata

for that? 🤔

Can I somehow keep track of things within a scenario between requests? For example, let's say I get a POST with an ID that was generated by my test subject, and I need that ID in a later GET in that scenario 🤔

When querying the request journal, can I find out which stub matched? Right now I do not see

id

or

name

in the response of

__admin/requests/find

🤔 (Sorry for the bombardement of questions 😄 )

Hi, Is there a way to exclude/ignore some specific headers from being proxied with wiremock proxying/recording? Please let me know if there are any options available. For instance, I would like to exclude the header X-forwarded-for before wiremock proxying the request to the destination.

For the services I'm testing I need to use WireMock standalone. I use the handlebars to apply some data in the test runner ( Cucumber). I've found that native Handlebars doesnt have the "now" helper built it. Where can I find that source code ? I would like to maintain the standard defined in the Wiremock documentation. I hope this is fair use of open source code. If not I'll write my own helper.

Hello, I have a question/request - I have made callback/webhook stub in WM and it works but I am currently stuck on how to access needed data from original request header. I need to pass an id from original request header to callback but I have no idea why. In WM documentation I have found only examples of how to pass parts of request body using jsonpath. But as far as I know request header is not JSON so it cant be used. Can any1 help? Crosspost from #general

Q: Do we consider https://javadoc.io/doc/com.github.tomakehurst/wiremock/latest/index.html as an official Javadoc hosting for the moment?

has renamed the channel from "wiremock-open-source" to "wiremock-java"

^ Renamied it to make it clear what it is about

Please i need help installing java on my wiremock ec2 instance

i keep getting errors like this: No match for argument: java-1.8.0-openjdk Error: Unable to find a match: java-1.8.0-openjdk

[ec2-user@ip-172-31-85-72 ~]$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk8/8u302-b08/jdk-8u302-linux-x64.tar.gz --2023-05-02 17:51:51-- https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk8/8u302-b08/jdk-8u302-linux-x64.tar.gz Resolving download.java.net (download.java.net)... 23.34.249.242 Connecting to download.java.net (download.java.net)|23.34.249.242|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2023-05-02 17:51:53 ERROR 404: Not Found.

Hi Team, In wiremock, when integrating with spring boot...not as a standalone...in the console it is stating that it has started on certain port...but the url is not testable in postman. Is there a necessity to be integrated with service. Can you please suggest an example on this. Thanks.

Untitled.java

Hi Team, I have written this code for wiremock integration testing with spring boot. Trying from few days, but getting this error. "Request was not matched because no stubs registered". 404 error. Can someone please suggest where the actual issue might be there. I have tried with the simplest stub also as possible, but still getting the same result.

Hello Team, Please i am having issues installing wiremock on my linux ec2 instance in aws. I keep getting the error after running the following command; $ wget https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/tomakehurst/wiremock-standalone/2.31.0/wiremock-standalone-2.31.0.jar --2023-05-08 12:36:27-- https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/tomakehurst/wiremock-standalone/2.31.0/wiremock-standalone-2.31.0.jar Resolving repo1.maven.org (repo1.maven.org)... 146.75.32.209, 2a04:4e42:79::209 Connecting to repo1.maven.org (repo1.maven.org)|146.75.32.209|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2023-05-08 12:36:27 ERROR 404: Not Found.

can someone help me please

Please is this running ….? if the server is up where do i put commands for my tests ?asking because the command prompt isn’t available to type .

Hello #wiremock-java i have an improvement idea for

wiremock-testcontainers-java

and would like to validate it with you Current API

private final Map<String, Extension> extensions = new HashMap<>();

WireMockContainer withExtension(String id, Collection<String> classNames, Collection<File> jars)
WireMockContainer withExtension(String id, Collection<String> classNames, File jarDirectory)
WireMockContainer withExtension(String id, String className)

example of usage

.withExtension("Webhook",
    Collections.singleton("org.wiremock.webhooks.Webhooks"),
    Collections.singleton(Paths.get("target", "test-wiremock-extension", "wiremock-webhooks-extension-2.35.0.jar").toFile()))
.withExtension("JSON Body Transformer",
    Collections.singleton("com.ninecookies.wiremock.extensions.JsonBodyTransformer"),
    Collections.singleton(Paths.get("target", "test-wiremock-extension", "wiremock-extensions-0.4.1-jar-with-dependencies.jar").toFile()));

Problem: • Field

id

brings confusion, it forces developers to create random string literal for each method invocation, since this

id

has no influence on behavior - values will be very random (absence of control / validation) • We store extention details

className

and

jar

as a value in

HashMap<ID, Extention>

, so we are not able to utilize Collections benefits like check for uniqueness (HashSet) • Even if developer mixed classNames with wrong jars

withExtnetion("ExtA", "JarB").withExtention("ExtB", "JarA")

it will work Improvement Options: Option 1

private final Set<String> extensionClassNames = new LinkedHashSet<>();
private final Set<File> extensionJars = new LinkedHashSet<>();

WireMockContainer withExtension(Collection<String> classNames, File jar)
WireMockContainer withExtension(Collection<String> classNames, Collection<File> jars);
WireMockContainer withExtension(Collection<String> classNames, Path jarDirectory)

Benefits: • Store all extensionJars in a LinkedHashSet to preserve an order and keep only unique values • Store all extensionClassNames in a LinkedHashSet to preserve an order and keep only unique value • all params for

--extention

will be stored in one collection

extensionClassNames

- easy to build cli command for docker • all params for

/var/wiremock/extentions

will be stored in one collection

extensionJars

- easy to build cli command for docker • Allow developer to organize and keep related Jars and classNames in one method Problem: • Even if developer mixed classNames with wrong jars

withExtnetion("ExtA", "JarB").withExtention("ExtB", "JarA")

it will work Option 2

private final Set<String> extensionClassNames = new LinkedHashSet<>();
private final Set<File> extensionJars = new LinkedHashSet<>();

WireMockContainer withExtensionFile(Collection<String> classNames)
WireMockContainer withExtensionClass(Collection<File> jars);

Benefits: • Store all extensionJars in a LinkedHashSet to preserve an order and keep only unique values • Store all extensionClassNames in a LinkedHashSet to preserve an order and keep only unique value • all params for

--extention

will be stored in one collection

extensionClassNames

- easy to build cli command for docker • all params for

/var/wiremock/extentions

will be stored in one collection

extensionJars

- easy to build cli command for docker • Very straignt forward api

Hi Team, In the below code, while I am trying to make custom error response in request filter class, when I am returning badRequest, it is giving 422 error code. But the expectation is 400. Can someone suggest a solution on this.

package com.example.wiremock.stub;

import java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException;

import org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;

import com.example.wiremock.errorhandler.BadRequestError;
import com.example.wiremock.errorhandler.MockError;
import com.example.wiremock.errorhandler.MockErrorResponse;
import com.example.wiremock.luukuresponse.LuukkuBasicInfoResponse;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Errors;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Errors.Error;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Errors.Error.Source;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Json;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.requestfilter.RequestFilterAction;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.extension.requestfilter.StubRequestFilter;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.HttpHeader;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.Request;
import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.ResponseDefinition;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;


@Component
public class BasicAuthRequestFilter extends StubRequestFilter { 


	
	public String decodeJwt(String token) throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
		String payload = token.split("\\.")[1];
		return new String(Base64.decodeBase64(payload), "UTF-8");
	}

	
    @Override
    public RequestFilterAction filter(Request request){
        	
    	if (request.header("Authorization").firstValue().matches("Bearer [a-zA-Z0-9&._-]{1,}")) {
        	
        	String authtoken = request.header("Authorization").firstValue();
        	
        	ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();

    		objectMapper.disable(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES);
    		
    		 Errors errors;

    		String str;
			try {
				
				String pattern = "^\\S{4}75-\\S{4}$";
				
				str = decodeJwt(authtoken);
				
				Token token = objectMapper.readValue(str, Token.class);
				
				String test = token.getRepresentation().getId();
				
				if(test.matches(pattern)) {
					
					Error error = new Error(400, null, "response", null);
					List<Error> listOfErros = new ArrayList<>();
					listOfErros.add(error);
                   				
					Errors errorList = new Errors(listOfErros);

					return RequestFilterAction.stopWith(ResponseDefinition.badRequest(errorList));
				}
			} catch (UnsupportedEncodingException  | JsonProcessingException e) {
				e.printStackTrace();
			}
			
			return RequestFilterAction.continueWith(request);
        }
		return null;

    	
    }

    @Override
    public String getName() {
        return "Authorization";
    }

Below is the error snapshot: