FYI <@U05JJ5KKWHE>, WDYT about a WireMock Dev Serv...
# wiremock-javao
Oleg Nenashev
11/23/2023, 8:39 PMFYI @Eric Deandrea, WDYT about a WireMock Dev Service? https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-wiremock/issues/58
Oleg Nenashev
11/23/2023, 8:41 PMI mean, technically it is a Dev Service, but not a containerized one
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:00 PMSorry for the delay in getting back to you. I was out on Thanksgiving Holiday.
As for a Wiremock dev service I definitely see value in it. I see 2 real uses cases:
1. Running during dev mode. This would be pretty “static”, meaning providing a consistent API for other downstream services the application may talk to. Microcks (https://github.com/microcks/microcks-quarkus) is doing something similar to this. You point it at the other service’s OpenAPI documents (or other artifacts for other types of services) and it will automatically proxy those services. We’re using this today in the Quarkus sample application (https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-super-heroes/tree/main/rest-fights#integration-with-microcks)
2. Running when running tests. This could be “static”, like dev mode, but could also be more dynamic. This is where the application would set different responses for different test scenarios within unit/integration tests. We’re doing this today in the Quarkus sample application.
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:02 PMTo be honest I didn’t realize there was a quarkus wiremock extension. Looking at the documentation (https://wiremock.org/docs/solutions/quarkus/) I don’t really see a solution for my #2 use case above.
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:02 PMActually it supports Integration tests
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:04 PMI was doing the presentation on the integration on friday, and here is my demo: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-quarkus-devservice-demo
It works pretty well with @QuarkusTest
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:04 PMOleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:06 PMAnd https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-wiremock/issues/70, Max Andersen is also involved
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:07 PMI see
@ConnectWireMockEric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:07 PMoh wait nevermind I found it
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:08 PMits in a separate artifact
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:09 PMYep. Comes from the test jar. It is documented but not 100% trivial. Once we have an official REST API client distribution, it will be easier
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:10 PMhow would the dev service work if i needed to reconfigure other properties based on the Wiremock url/port? For example, I may need to configure a rest client property, something I would generally do inside a
QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManagerEric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:10 PMEric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:12 PMDoes the wiremock extension expose properties that I could read?
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:12 PMRight now it is not supported, I submitted a GitHub issue last week. Right now you have to fix the port, because there is no real-time propagation, and it's not something sustainable
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:12 PMgotcha
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:13 PMfor example, the microcks extension exposes some properties that can be used in the app configuration.
Kinda like this: https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-super-heroes/blob/main/rest-fights/src/main/resources/application.properties#L41
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:13 PM(something I contributed to that extension 🙂 )
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:13 PMYep. This is what one needs to do with WireMock too
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:14 PMbut this is definitely a good start
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:15 PMSo yeah, I might just copy-paste the implementation 🙂
https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-wiremock/issues/68
Actually there is a PR from maintainer now: https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-wiremock/pull/74
🎉 1
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:18 PMEric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:18 PMOnce its a little more stable i can certainly pull this into the sample application
🙌 1
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:19 PMi’d love to get the grpc extension in there too. Right now I’m using something else because verification wasn’t yet there in the wiremock extension
o
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:19 PMVerification means contract testing for the spec, right?
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:20 PMo
Oleg Nenashev
11/27/2023, 1:20 PMOnce its a little more stable i can certainly pull this into the sample applicationGreat! I will keep evolving my example too, because I have a few Quarkus talks submitted
e
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:20 PMalthough I’m not sure if that PR has made it into a release yet, because I don’t see any updated docs around it on https://wiremock.org/docs/grpc/
Eric Deandrea
11/27/2023, 1:21 PMi actually did my own PR for that functionality not realizing that Tom had done it too! https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-grpc-extension/pull/11
16 Views