Rajesh Singh
10/22/2025, 9:51 PMLee Turner
10/23/2025, 7:45 AMetc etc part is.
Also, is there any reason why you are using version 3.3.1 and not the latest?Lee Turner
10/23/2025, 7:57 AMWIREMOCK_DISABLE_REQUEST_JOURNAL: "true" part from ?
I am not sure I have seen that before. Perhaps it might be worth trying WIREMOCK_OPTIONS instead. This is documented on the Running in Docker pageRajesh Singh
10/23/2025, 8:34 AMLee Turner
10/23/2025, 8:40 AM3.3.1 for any particular reason, might as well use the latest 3.13.1 or even one of the 4.x beta releases if you want to be on the cutting edge š
In terms of WIREMOCK_DISABLE_REQUEST_JOURNAL I think you are correct in that it doesn't do anything so I would drop that. It sounds like something AI would come up with š
I would move to configuring it as per the Docker page on the OSS docs site - https://wiremock.org/docs/standalone/docker/
The options you want to try out are:
⢠--no-request-journal
⢠--disable-request-logging
⢠--max-template-cache-entries <some low number>
⢠--async-response-enabled
You can find all of these options and how to use them detailed on this page - https://wiremock.org/docs/standalone/java-jar/Rajesh Singh
10/24/2025, 5:35 AM