This message was deleted WireMock #help

Join Slack

This message was deleted.

# help

Slackbot

12/08/2023, 7:19 AM

This message was deleted.

Marcel

12/08/2023, 7:27 AM

I then tried with

@RegisterExtension

but it appears the WM server isn’t started yet when my

@BeforeEach

is invoked.

Copy code

@QuarkusTest
internal class FooTest {
    @RegisterExtension
    val wireMockExtension = WireMockExtension.newInstance()
        .options(wireMockConfig().dynamicPort().dynamicHttpsPort())
        .build()!!

    @BeforeEach
    fun `set-up mocks`() {
        // fails with NPE because server isn't started yet
        wireMockExtension.baseUrl()
    }
}

Marcel

12/08/2023, 8:45 AM

The only way to make this work AFAICS is to use the plain Java setup and do everything manually.

Copy code

@QuarkusTest
internal class FooTest {

    companion object {
        private val wireMockServer = WireMockServer(options().dynamicPort())

        @JvmStatic
        @BeforeAll
        fun startWireMockServer() {
            wireMockServer.start()
        }

        @JvmStatic
        @AfterAll
        fun stopWireMockServer() {
            wireMockServer.stop()
        }
    }
}

The downside is that I need to prefix all WM method calls like

stubFor

verify

with

wireMockServer.

for them to go to the one WM instance created manually.

Oleg Nenashev

12/08/2023, 10:07 AM

@Marcel definitely it shouldn't be like that. Due to the reasons unknown why more context gets serialized, and it's not designed for that

Oleg Nenashev

12/08/2023, 10:08 AM

It is not a stack trace and particularly missing from the Jenkins times :) I can take a look later, but maybe the temperature solution would be using the wiremock developer service https://docs.quarkiverse.io/quarkus-wiremock/dev/index.html

33 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next