This message was deleted.

What version of WireMock?

3.0.3

Is there a reason you couldn’t use

and

instead of

includes

?

I'n fairly new to Wiremock. I understand your example with and that there is only one parameter id that must contain 2 but not 3. The other should mean that there is one id parameter that contains 2, but none of the other id parameters contains 3. At least that is what I want Wiremock to do.

Ah! So your request could be something like

<http://www.foo.com/things?fq=1&fq=2&fq=3>

?

that's the real deal 😉

facet.field={!ex%3DfaqCategory}faqCategory&facet.field={!ex%3DnewsCategory}newsCategory&facet.field={!ex%3DpublicationCategory}publicationCategory&<http://json.nl|json.nl>=flat&f.newsCategory.facet.sort=index&fl=*,score&start=0&f.faqCategory.facet.sort=index&sort=newsStarttimeStamp+asc&fq=siteHash:"f849f0f9bbe6858353def4124139e591f8be4591"&fq={!typo3access}-1,0&fq=(type:"tx_news_domain_model_news")&fq=(newsIsEvent:"false")&fq=(newsStartYear:"2023")&rows=10&facet.limit=100&json.facet={"type":{"type":"terms","field":"type","limit":100,"mincount":1},"newsStartYear":{"type":"terms","field":"newsStartYear","limit":100,"mincount":1},"newsIsEvent":{"type":"terms","field":"newsIsEvent","limit":100,"mincount":1},"programChannel":{"type":"terms","field":"programChannel","limit":100,"mincount":1},"programType":{"type":"terms","field":"programType","limit":100,"mincount":1},"programs":{"type":"terms","field":"programPrograms","limit":100,"mincount":1,"domain":{"excludeTags":"programPrograms"}},"category":{"type":"terms","field":"category","limit":100,"mincount":1},"doktype":{"type":"terms","field":"doktype","limit":100,"mincount":1},"jobType":{"type":"terms","field":"jobType","limit":100,"mincount":1},"publicationYear":{"type":"terms","field":"publicationYear","limit":100,"mincount":1},"departments":{"type":"terms","field":"employeeDepartments","limit":100,"mincount":1,"domain":{"excludeTags":"employeeDepartments"}}}&q=*&defType=edismax&omitHeader=false&f.publicationCategory.facet.sort=index&qf=content^40.0+title^5.0+keywords^2.0+tagsH1^5.0+tagsH2H3^3.0+tagsH4H5H6^2.0+tagsInline+description^4.0+abstract+subtitle+navtitle+author&facet.mincount=1&facet=true&wt=json&facet.sort=count

ok hmmmmmm, not super familiar with uses cases where the same qp is repeated

Me neither. Solr is the only API I know with repeated argeuments. Except of course the goold old PHP magic foobar[] where an array is built fro the repeated foobar[] 🙂

my guess is that out of the box, WireMock doesn’t handle this well, because it will try to match on any of the qps provided. So if I have something that’s like…

"id": {
        "and": [
          {
            "contains": "2"
          },
          {
            "doesNotContain": "3"
          }
        ]
      }

and a request that is like:

<http://foo.com/?id=3&id=2>

I’ll get a match on the case where

id=2

, because

id

contains 2 and doesNotContain 3, even though there is that other

id=3

.

could very well be like that

If that is true (and I’m not sure how big of an

if

that is 😭 ), the best solution would be to write a custom matcher that parses the query parameters yourself. https://wiremock.org/docs/extensibility/custom-matching/

I'll leave that to a colleague He's the very man to extend Java servers 😉

😭 some days I curse the fact that I work on a heavy Kotlin/Swift team and I’m one of the few with Java experience

I haven't written any line of Java for years (decades?) But in the end the languages resemble so much that I'm confident I could write the matcher myself. If I fail it will probably because I don't understand the documentation. 🙂

I try to tell my team members that if they know Kotlin they know Java but they’re adamant they can’t do it 😛

Poor man. With that attitude they will even have trouble with TypeScript ;)

🤦🏻‍♂️ it was right there the whole time

Don't worry. I have fiddled around for too long already before asking. Talking to you got me thinking.