This message was deleted.
# helps
Slackbot
05/16/2023, 9:13 PMThis message was deleted.
✅ 1
o
Oleg Nenashev
05/17/2023, 2:36 PMI need to look into the code to say for sure
m
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 3:21 PMIt's wiremock standalone which was having initial size of body was 45KB , after reducing it to 3.8KB. it worked. At standalone side I do not see any error message but at the client end it was failing during auto testing. When reduced the size it worked.
{
"id" : "03bb1808-b4b3-4433-b522-b8639d22d15c",
"name" : "display-users-details",
"request" : {
"url" : "/services/users/details",
"method" : "GET"
},
"response" : {
"status" : 200,
"bodyFileName" : "usersdetails.json",
"headers" : {
"Content-Type" : "application/json;charset=utf-8",
"Date" : "Fri, 05 May 2023 132158 GMT"
}
},
"uuid" : "03bb1808-b4b3-4433-b522-b8639d22d15c"
}
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 3:38 PMI was getting "body: { message: 'payload removed due to size', length: 45226 }" at the client side and wrongly miss read the error is due to file size though it's not an error. but fortunately or unfortunately when I reduced the size of the json file. My client started working.
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 3:39 PMSo I'm curious if there is any limit set on the size of response body sent by wiremock.
o
Oleg Nenashev
05/17/2023, 3:41 PMMost likely yes. I suspect it's a limit on the jetty side but I still need to confirm it
Oleg Nenashev
05/17/2023, 3:44 PMSo far I cannot find the repository from where "payload removed due to size" comes from so I am a bit puzzled and need a debugger
Oleg Nenashev
05/17/2023, 3:46 PMCould it be the truncation on the receiver side or maybe on the intelligent proxy side? It would be nice to check what actually WireMock responds on its end
m
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 3:48 PMplease ignore "payload removed due to size" as said it's at the client side. I initially thought its a error but the client have configured to remove body at the logging end. I mis read it as error but luckily it helped in identifying the issue.
👍 1
o
Oleg Nenashev
05/17/2023, 5:58 PMSo basically all good, right?
m
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 9:01 PMyes.
Muthukkumar Ponnusamy
05/17/2023, 9:04 PMThank you for looking into it.
o
Oleg Nenashev
05/18/2023, 5:36 AMHappy to help!
168 Views