<@U04NTGJ6Z1D> are we keeping track of new documen...
# wiremock-java
t
@Oleg Nenashev are we keeping track of new documentation needed for these DSL changes we're merging?
o
The current contributing policy expects the documentation to be created before merging 🙂
Indeed we have a bunch of 3.x documentation that is missing, and I think creating follow-up documentation tickets in https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org is the best option if you do not want to be slowed down
When creating tickets, please put the
wiremock-3.x
label on them
t
I just noticed we’ve had quite a few PRs merged or under consideration that add to the DSL, so wanted to be sure we weren’t building up an uncatalogued documentation deficit
o
Have I missed any PRs that contribute to the DSL? I might have misunderstood the scope of some introduced apis