Title
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/19/2023, 12:45 PM:wiremock: The website repository is cleaned up and available for contributions! We also added continuous delivery for the website, so now all integrated changes will be deployed without manual stes and pinging @Tom or @Mark Gerrard 🙂 If you see any documentation you'd like to improve, just do so or submit the documentation tickets via GitHub Issues! https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org
👍 3
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:32 PMDoes it mean that docs on https://docs.wiremock.io/ autodeployes from https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org and it will be actually every build?
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:34 PMNope. So far I changed the flow only for the community website, but yes we can do the same for WireMock Cloud Docs. CC @Tom just to confirm
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:35 PMand for that https://wiremock.org/docs/ first of all please 🙂
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:35 PM@Albert Vesker this is already published from the repository you mentioned
🙌 1
I am about to do a major update there. I think we still keep Jekyll for some time but I want to improve from navigation and contents beyond the Java side. Also getting started flows. If you would like to participate, please let me know!
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:41 PMAnd I want to say that UI style of site is better on cloud version than open source 🙂
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:45 PMWell, my first step is making it contributeable. I guess you don't want a Jenkins maintainer to work on the UI of your website anyway 😉
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:46 PM))
so that there is no misunderstanding -
this was not a remark, but an offer
👍 1
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:49 PMAnd all contributions are welcome! Currently the website uses the 5 years old Jekyll theme which is not great on its own, for example no dark mode support and not that great navigation bar that makes documentation difficult
I guess the first nice step would be to update the Jekyll theme to the recent version, and to actually detach it from the code base, because right now it is just a hard fork and we would rather want to have a git submodule
On the other hand, I really want to switch the docs to Docusaurus or Antora, so maybe it is better to do this migration instead of intermediate steps
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:51 PMSomething on the FrontEnd language....
😁
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:56 PMWelcome to open source, I am actually a hardware engineer : 😁
Well not really anymore but I have started there
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:57 PMI'm AQA)
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 12:58 PMYes, thanks!
a
Albert Vesker
04/20/2023, 12:58 PMmissed thread)
👍 1
o
Oleg Nenashev
04/20/2023, 2:55 PMBut yes basically you can easily edit the website contents locally and submit pull requests. There is a new contributing guide in the repository. Any reports/patches for that are also welcome