I just wanted to know can we run wiremock on local machine instead of running it on a server. currently we are running wiremocks to automate different security tools on jenkins server. but we are not able to run the same setup on our local machine.

Hi Team, i have started the wiremock using "i start the wiremock using the command "java -cp wiremock-jre8-standalone-2.35.0.jar;wiremock-webhooks-extension-2.35.0.jar com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner --extensions org.wiremock.webhooks.Webhooks --https-port 8001 --https-keystore ./wiremock.jks"

i have added the cem file to the wiremock.jks as well

when i try to call https post method. getting error as "Error: write EPROTO 64261128:error:10000410:SSL routines😮PENSSL_internal:SSLV3_ALERT_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE:../../../../src/third_party/boringssl/src/ssl/tls_record.cc:594:SSL alert number 40"

Hi Team, how can i pass a parameter value from the request body and put that value in the webhook body

wireMockServer.stubFor(post("/one")
                .willReturn(ok())
                .withPostServeAction("webhook", webhook()
                        .withMethod(POST)
                        .withUrl("<http://my-target-host/callback>")
                        .withHeader("Content-Type", "application/xml")
                        .withTransformers("xml/response/responsetest.xml")
                        .withBodyFile("xml/response/responsetest.xml"))
);

getting error on method ".withTransformers"

Do we have any option to get the wehbook response to a string variable in java project

Any suggestion or document to test wiremock webhook using rest assured or any other framework ?

Hey Everyone, I am trying to setup wiremock with my emulator to capture and modify(similar to what mitmproxy does) http and https request for android native app. 1. I have installed the certificate in emulator. 2. I want to only intercept 2-3 any call (there are 100s of different call to different host). So basically want to whitelist every other call except the ones I wan to put stub for.

HashMap<ExecutionDataKeys, Object> executionStates = new HashMap<>();
WireMockServer wireMockServer = new WireMockServer(
        new WireMockConfiguration().port(8080)
                .notifier(new Slf4jNotifier(true))
);
wireMockServer.start();
ArrayList<String> hostNames = new ArrayList<>(
        Arrays.asList(
                "<https://host1.com>",
                "<https://host2.com>",
        ));

hostNames.forEach(host->{
    wireMockServer.stubFor(any(urlMatching(host+".*"))
            .atPriority(10)
            .willReturn(aResponse().proxiedFrom(host)));
});

I have also set proxy in emulator to localhost:8080. But it seems whitlisting is not working. all of my request are getting blocked. P.S. I am trying to use appium along with wiremock to test state changes in application [10:53 PM] I have already waster 3-4 days on this, and feeling kind exausted in this. [10:53 PM] Please advice

Hi, Is there a documentation on stubbing

application/x-www-form-urlencoded

request?

how can i add wiremock opensource project as a service in services.msc

Hi

have anyone encountered an issue in which the response template mapping is not happening for a standalone version?

I have 2 wiremock servers using wiremock v2.31.0, I copied my Dockerfile on both server and run the docker build to create the image on that server. 1 server works, while the other doesn't.

server version: NAME="Amazon Linux" VERSION="2" ID="amzn" ID_LIKE="centos rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="2" PRETTY_NAME="Amazon Linux 2" ANSI_COLOR="0;33"

let me know if you need more info

Hi Everyone , just a quick question - Is it possible to import OpenAPI spec to wiremock opensource other than using wiremock cloud ? is there any way we can have this feature added as part of wiremock opensource ?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to call via Wiremock an external endpoint protected by mutual authentication; here the config:

wireMockConfiguration = options()
                        .disableRequestJournal()
                        .usingFilesUnderDirectory(rootFolder)
                        .port(Integer.parseInt(getProperty("port")))
                        .adminAuthenticator(getAdminAuthenticator())
                        .jettyAcceptors(Integer.parseInt(getPropertyOrDefault("acceptor.threads", DEFAULT_ACCEPTOR_THREADS)))
                        .keystorePath(getProperty("keystore.path"))
                        .keystorePassword(getProperty("keystore.password"))
                        .trustStorePath(getProperty("truststore.path"))
                        .trustStorePassword(getProperty("truststore.password"))
                        .extensions(
                                new AdminRequestLoggingFilter(),
                                new ServiceRequestLoggingFilter(),
                                new ServiceResponseLoggingFilter(),
                                new ResponseTemplateTransformer(true));

Here the error:

SL failure trying to make a proxied request from WireMock to ...
PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target

My keystore contains my private cert and the truststore contains the server certificate (everything ok with curl). Is there something missing? Thanks Alessandro

Do the

basicAuth

keys support regex matching? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75614289/wiremock-json-template-basicauth-and-doesnotmatch-not-working I ran this locally and was getting the same error, even with switching to

basicAuthCredentials

.

Hello, I was trying to run Wiremock studio from my local machine. When i launch it from window it throws below error. Could somebody help me if i am missing anything.:

how can i pass a xml file in the response using .withPostServeAction

i am setting up a new project. Using

"org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-contract-stub-runner"

But I am getting the following error and not sure why. Any help ?

Request was not matched
                                               =======================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Closest stub                                             | Request                                                  |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           |
GET                                                        | GET
/ldap_directory_items/v2/group_members?key=key&name=APP-O  | /ldap_directory_items/v2/group_members?key=key&name=APP-O
AUTH2-ABCD&size=100000                                     | AUTH2-ABCD&size=100000
                                                           |
                                                           |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi! I am trying to use the form data of a request in the response. The request body looks like this

flag1[enabled]=true&transfer[destination]=target_account&metadata[userId]=1-2-3-4&metadata[sessionId]=a-b-c

I am having a hard time to use the values in the response. I am parsing the form via

{{formData request.body 'params' urlDecode=true}}

and I can see the values fine when doing

{{#each params}}
{{@index}} - {{@key}} - {{this}}
{{/each}}

But I cannot access the individual fields, no matter what I try, e.g.,

{{"metadata[userId]"}}
{{metadata\[userId\]}}
{{metadata.userId}}

My Google-fu also failed me 😕

On another note: I am using some

assign

and a

formData

expressions at the top of my response (referenced via

bodyFileName

) and it seems that they get replaced by an empty line, i.e., I have a few empty lines before my JSON response body starts. For now I just cram everything in one line and start the JSON object there, too, but it is really unreadable 😕

{{#assign 'a'}}...{{/assign}}{{#assign 'b'}}...{{/assign}}{{formData ...}}{
  "id": ...
...
}

Is there a better way to suppress the empty lines in this case?

I am trying to mock two different requests to the same endpoint. One mock is set up like this

"request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "urlPattern": "/store|/v2/store",
        "queryParameters": {
          "client": {
            "matches": "STORE-ABC-.+"
          },
...
          }
        }

and the second looks like this

"request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "urlPattern": "/store|/v2/store",
        "queryParameters": {
          "client": {
            "matches": "STORE-123-.+"
          },
...
        }
      },

Both have additional but the same query parameters to match. Both also have different body patterns to match. When I send this request (from WireMock's log)

POST /v2/store?client=STORE-123-12345&user=userId&realm=realm&key=sessionId

I see that WireMock only tries the other request (STORE-ABC) but fails because it cannot match some parts of the body patterns of STORE-ABC, even though STORE-123 would match. So I wonder if WireMock even tries the STORE-123 mock because I cannot see it in the log. More curiosly, at the very end I get a "closest stub" that is a completely different stub where of course neither URL nor body match; how come it shows this, and not for example the stubs it tried?

Can I disable a mapping without removing the file from the

mappings

folder, e.g., by adding a

disabled: true

field or so? 🤔

I wonder if I can set some values in the stub to use as template values in the response. For example, let's say I have a generic response for a

DELETE

endpoint, and I have a response

bodyFileName

that has something like

{
  "message": "Deleted {{arguments.count}} items"
}

And then I would have a stub like this

{
  "request": ...,
  "response": {
    "bodyFileName": ...,
    "arguments": {
      "count": 1
    }
...
}

Or can I use the

metadata

for that? 🤔

Can I somehow keep track of things within a scenario between requests? For example, let's say I get a POST with an ID that was generated by my test subject, and I need that ID in a later GET in that scenario 🤔

When querying the request journal, can I find out which stub matched? Right now I do not see

id

or

name

in the response of

__admin/requests/find

🤔 (Sorry for the bombardement of questions 😄 )