hello

I am having a challenge getting SSL setup on my standalone mock server

Hi Team, i m using wiremock standalone. when i start the wiremock using the command "java -cp wiremock-jre8-standalone-2.35.0.jar;wiremock-webhooks-extension-2.35.0.jar com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.standalone.WireMockServerRunner --extensions org.wiremock.webhooks.Webhooks --https-port 8001 --https-keystore ./wiremock.jks"

when i try to call api post method. getting error as "Error: write EPROTO 64261128:error:10000410:SSL routines😮PENSSL_internal:SSLV3_ALERT_HANDSHAKE_FAILURE:../../../../src/third_party/boringssl/src/ssl/tls_record.cc:594:SSL alert number 40"

i have added the cem file to the wiremock.jks as well

can you please help me

Hi friends I'm new to WireMock and facing a issu, which I doesn't understand. I'm using wiremock-jre8-standalone-2.31.0 and try to use the placeholders for the

equalToJson

. In fact I've a date as property, which is created with LocalDateTime.now(). And clearly this date will never match. So here is my jsonRequestBody

String jsonRequestBody = String.format("{ \"document\": {\"documentData\": \"%s\"}, \"documentMetadata\": {\"documentId\": \"MYA-1234\", \"docType\": \"LEA\", \"docDataType\": \"PDF\", \"docName\": \"Some pdf\", \"insuredId\": 2000001, \"partnerId\": null, \"familyId\": 1000001, \"offerId\": null, \"contractId\": null, \"receiptId\": null, \"statementOfBenfitsId\": null, \"dasId\": null, \"zsrId\": null, \"enforcementId\": null, \"vipCode\": null, \"dossierId\": null, \"debitorId\": null, \"taskId\": null, \"tessiImageId\": null, \"invoiceId\": null, \"creationDate\": \"%s\", \"changeDate\": null, \"startDateRetentionPeriod\": null, \"insuranceType\": null, \"overdueReminderType\": null, \"receiptType\" : null, \"tessiType\" : null}}", document.getContent(), "${json-unit.ignore}");

As u can see, for the creationDate I'm trying to use a placeholder, like it's described here: https://wiremock.org/docs/request-matching/ But it doesn't work. Any idea why? Thank you in advance

Hey Everyone, I am trying to setup wiremock with my emulator to capture and modify(similar to what mitmproxy does) http and https request for android native app. 1. I have installed the certificate in emulator. 2. I want to only intercept 2-3 any call (there are 100s of different call to different host). So basically want to whitelist every other call except the ones I wan to put stub for.

HashMap<ExecutionDataKeys, Object> executionStates = new HashMap<>();
WireMockServer wireMockServer = new WireMockServer(
        new WireMockConfiguration().port(8080)
                .notifier(new Slf4jNotifier(true))
);
wireMockServer.start();
ArrayList<String> hostNames = new ArrayList<>(
        Arrays.asList(
                "<https://host1.com>",
                "<https://host2.com>",
        ));

hostNames.forEach(host->{
    wireMockServer.stubFor(any(urlMatching(host+".*"))
            .atPriority(10)
            .willReturn(aResponse().proxiedFrom(host)));
});

I have also set proxy in emulator to localhost:8080. But it seems whitlisting is not working. all of my request are getting blocked. P.S. I am trying to use appium along with wiremock to test state changes in application [10:53 PM] I have already waster 3-4 days on this, and feeling kind exausted in this. [10:53 PM] Please advice

@Daniel Ma, can you please advice

would really luv a QA perspective

Hey folks, I am using wiremock server in a container alongside my application server container in the same kube pod. I am getting a port conflict where my app is unable to start at 8080 because wiremock by default listens to 8080. Is there a way to configure wiremock to listen on a different port in dockerfile?

Hello everyone! I am trying to add some custom extensions, that would do matching for encrypted data without any artificial headers etc. All works fine, but after the request that i want to be matched, there comes another one (completely different url) that should be matched normally, without custom matcher. But my custom matcher kicks in as well in there. I filter out as noMatch any request that does not contain my parameters. I tried to debug and it looks like also the second call gets parameters, that are actually only configured for the 1st one! What can cause this behaviour? Here is the 1st request, that works fine

"mappings": [
    {
      "request": {
        "urlPath": "/my-url",
        "method": "POST",
        "customMatcher" : {
          "name" : "encrypted-request-matcher",
          "parameters" : {
            "myParameter" : "someValueThatWillMatch"
          }
        },

This is 2nd one, that tries to match, but should not be even considered for matching.

"mappings": [
    {
      "request": {
        "url": "/another-url",
        "method": "POST",
        "bodyPatterns": [
          {
            "equalToJson": {
              "data": {
                "type": "identifier",
                "attributes": {
                  "id": "1"
                }
              }

I put some debugs in custom matcher and it is clearly visible, that when wiremock attempts to match 2nd request (why would it even go through custom matcher?) it still holds the params from the 1st one! So "myParameter" : "someValueThatWillMatch" is still there. I use standalone wiremock instance.

OK, to follow up on my question, i believe, that when 2 requests are send one after another, Wiremock somehow goes for custom matcher 1st, disregarding that url matcher does not match. So as a workaround i match the url in my extension too. It works now, although it makes code more polluted. Ofc you can also just catch exceptions and return noMatch in this case

Hello, I set up a wiremock docker in AWS EC2, does anyone know how can I restrict the access to the Wiremock? The server will be accessed by different people in different places, so the IP restriction won't work.

Hi @Louis Liao You cannot set such restrictions in WireMock OSS. For that, you can use WireMock Cloud which includes a permissions/authorization mechanism - https://www.wiremock.io/

Hello! I have a question about

repeatsAsScenarios

option if running WireMock as standalone app in docker container. Looks like this option is set to

false

by default because in the logs I see messages like

Not recording mapping for /some/url as this has already been received

In my case it's crucial to record and replay all such queries as a scenario. What can I do here?

hi. I setup a wiremock inside a pod in kubernetes. is it possible to configure the wiremock (running on the pod) with java code that run from outside the kubernetes cluster? (or i must use the APIs..) the reason for that is that the test for setting up the wiremock is executed from a runner in gitlab ci. (external to the kubernetes cluster) the access to the pod will be available by setting an ingress to the pod.