This is actually somewhat of a blocker for us now 😞 https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/2364 Since we had to disable scenarios, tests that mutate data will always replay the latest request and that means the test will fail on second run because that data will be returned already-mutated 😕

Hi everyone, Getting the below error when using this code

_findAll_(RequestPatternBuilder._newRequestPattern_().withUrl("/v2/pusher/user"));

{
  "errors": [
    {
      "code": 10,
      "source": {
        "pointer": "/timestamp"
      },
      "title": "Error parsing JSON",
      "detail": "Unrecognized field \"timestamp\" (class com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Errors), not marked as ignorable"
    }
  ]
}

I am getting this when calling static method to query wiremock server version using:

2.35.1

but works fine when doing,

wiremock.find(RequestPatternBuilder._newRequestPattern_().withUrl("/v2/pusher/user"))

Can someone please help ?

Hello ! Glad to find out that slack about this great tool ! I am currently trying to migrate to 3.0.1 to play a bit with new functionalities but I am bit blocked by the change in the

ResponseTemplateTransformer

🙂 Here is what I implemented before:

new ResponseTemplateTransformer(true, DateTemplate.NAME, dateTemplate)

The

DateTemplate

being a private class implementing the

Helper<T>

. I guess now I have to implement

TemplateModelDataProviderExtension

but I can't find any documentation on how to properly use it. Is its output

Map<String, Object>

is a map of helpers ? Should I just register

TemplateModelDataProviderExtension

like any other extensions through

Options

? Thank you very much for the help, don't hesitate to ask precision !

Hello I'm seeking some help to understand how/when Helper extensions are applied. I'm using 2 types of stubs (which were working fine with Wiremock v2) : • returning a template file (using aResponse().withBodyFile(...)) • returning a dynamic data response (using a ResponseDefinitionTransformerV2 implementation)

ResponseDefinitionBuilder.like(serveEvent.getResponseDefinition())
   .withBody(mapper.writeValueAsBytes(customResponseObject))
   .build()

I'm trying to include data generated via a Helper class. I've been testing my code with Wiremock's trim

{{trim request.headers.User-Agent}}

If that string is included in the template file, it is processed and replaced. If that string is included in in object included via withBody, it is no processed. Are helpers disabled when a ResponseDefinitionTransformerV2 is used ? Should I avoid using them both at the same time ? Is there anyway to debug that situation (some log level, Wiremock class looping through all extensions, for example) ? Feel free to ask for any precision, and thank you for any answer you can provide.

Hi everyone, I am looking for some guidance on how to get WireMock standalone working with my application running on an Android emulator trying to make an HTTPS call. WireMock setup: java -jar wiremock-standalone-3.0.4.jar --port 8080 --https-port 443 --verbose --print-all-network-traffic --https-keystore MITM.jks --keystore-type JKS --enable-browser-proxying --trust-all-proxy-targets The MITM.jks file was generated from the MITM cert. MITM cert setup link: https://docs.mitmproxy.org/stable/howto-install-system-trusted-ca-android/ I followed the link above and added the MITM cert to my Android emulator as a system ca cert Emulator proxy setup: Hostname: 127.0.0.1 and port: 8080 Application setup: The app is running as is with no network change. The goal is to capture the https calls made from the app and mock them. Also an additional goal is to forward some request to the original backend server. Currently I am not able to get this to work and am seeing 2023-09-11 114444.141 Opened Socket[addr=/127.0.0.1,port=59978,localport=8080] 2023-09-11 114444.142 Incoming bytes: CONNECT 23.223.244.152:443 HTTP/1.1 2023-09-11 114444.142 Outgoing bytes: HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 50 Connection: close

can we mock SOAP API with wiremock?

@here we are using wiremock version 2.26 in the application for which I am creating requestMapping , we have thought to upgrade to more recent version or at least higher but due to variety of dependent changes in the application itself we have not done as of now not planning to do it in recent future. Can anyone provide me link to documentation that give me request matcher for specific to 2.26 version so that I can use to match requests. Some of the requestMatchers from https://wiremock.org/docs/request-matching doc might be not useful? Please guide

Hi everyone, could you help me? (sorry for my bad english) I need to do something like this: mapping:

{
  "request": {
    "method": "POST",
    "url": "/api/endpoint"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "transformers": [
      "response-template"
    ],
    "bodyFileName": "response.json",
    "headers": {
      "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }
  }
}

response.json

{
  "message": "Hello, {{request.body.message}}!",
  "status": 200
}

I need this response:

{
  "message": "Hello, Carlos!",
  "status": 200
}

but I get this:

{
  "message": "Hello, {{request.body.message}}!",
  "status": 200
}

request body:

{
  "message": "Carlos"
}

What's wrong? Is it possible? wiremock standalone 3.0.1 java -jar wiremock-standalone-3.0.1.jar --port 8282 --verbose Linux server Thanks a lot!!

Heya all, is there a math helper to calculate the absolute of a number? I need to return a positive number all the time

Hi team, Need small help here. I have XML as the request. I want to match the XML tags in the request. but the error is always body not matched when I run this. If anyone can pls help. Here is an example of my XML - <?XML version="1.0"?> <Getlocation xmlns="HTTP://namespace"> <searchdetails> <Search> <City>New York<City? <countrycode>xx<countrycode> <searchdetails> My mapping file looks like the below: { "priority": 1, "request": { "method" : "GET", "URLPATH" :"/send-me", "bodypatterns" : [{ "matchesXPath":"searchdetails[city=\"New York\" or countrycode=\"xx"\"]", "xPathNamespaces" :{ "xlmns" : "HTTP://namespace" } }] }

Sorry for the delay, will catch up on help queries tonight. Was too deep in Python and FastAPI dives

Hello! Is there a way to serve a default bodyfile if the requested file does not exist? I saw Tom’s answer on stackoverflow, but that requires creating an extension. Is it still the only possible solution? I’m currently using wiremock-standalone-3.0.0

i have url and request like the following form <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Header> <ns1:SessionHeader mustUnderstand:mustUnderstand="0" xmlns:ns1="urn:partner.soap.sforce.com" xmlns:mustUnderstand="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <ns1:sessionId>00D2v000002GWbf!AQ4AQFhfVRLwZaIBOi3lSU3IZe4AhmshG71BzghHuel547sz4tbWi7hVCgpvBrdR2nVO9TnQw.nI7qXWTQufxonCx72aZ66Z</ns1:sessionId> </ns1:SessionHeader> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> and response in xml form in SOAP API, i want to mock in wiremock standalone jar, can u hel mw with this?

@all- I deployed wire-mock app in eks cluster. I don't see admin urls are working there... getting not found...

may i know how admin urls can work if we deploy on remote servers

Hello, I am running wiremock from a docker container. And I need to write a custom transformer. How can I load my transformer in the docker container?

Hello, I am using wiremock in a standalone docker container. I was wondering if there is a way to have wiremock log in json (logstash) format?

Hi! I currently have multiple transformers within a single extension jar file. However when I run it with the following command, only the last transformer defined in the command is getting picked up (tried switching around both). Should I have a unique extension jar file for each transformer or is it an issue with the command?

java -cp default-response.jar:wiremock-standalone-3.0.0.jar \wiremock.Run

—`extensions org.xyz.abcTransformer,org.xyz.defTransformer` Also, I cannot get —local-response-templating to work along with the above command

Hello, i have a problem with extension usage (wiremock-extension-state) for wiremock-standalone and Dockerfile instructions. We do not want to have extension jar in our wiremock repo, so i was thinking that i can get extension standalone jar with wget and add something like

RUN mkdir ./extensions
RUN wget -O ./extensions/wiremock-state-extension-standalone-0.1.0.jar {{url}}

to Dockerfile. But I understand now that i have no idea how to get this url and can i do it at all). So the question is: how can i download extension?

Hello 👋🏻 Our development environment is running on top of Kubernetes which is running on AWS Spot instances. For this reason, all of our services need to be running in a highly available way which includes shared state and load balancer. Is this possible with WireMocks? While going through the documentation there did not seem to be any documentation related to multiple WireMocks instances sharing state.

I am trying to simulate a JSON based API in which based on the value of one of the parameter from request payload ("phone"), the response would be mapped. If the value start with 5 and it contains 10 digit the success response would be triggered. I am using standalone wiremock jar for this simulation. Issue - Somehow my mapping is not working, even if I send the value of "phone" tag with more then 10 digits or digits starting with any value it is responding with the mapped response. Expectation - Based on the regex configured in mapping, the wiremock should only respond with success response only if the starting digit is 5 and total length is 10 characters. Please let me know what changes I need to make in my mapping file. Below is the content of my mapping file -

{

"name": "email_happypath", "request": { "method": "POST", "url": "/send/email", "bodyPatterns": [ { "matchesJsonPath": "$.phone", "matches": "^5\\d[9]$" } ] }, "response": { "status": 200, "headers": { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, "bodyFileName": "email_happypath.json", "transformers" : ["response-template"] } }

Just wanted to confirm - I believe it's already been discussed so please point me to a doc if that answers best - but is Wiremock 2.x supported any more, or will 3.x now be the only supported release?

Hello i am new to wiremock and have a question. i am running wiremock with testcontainers and have a

StubRequestFilter

CustomFilter and i want to run my wiremock container with this extension. how should i run this? i tried following https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/tree/master/test-extension by putting the classpath of my filter in resources/extensions and running

.withCommand(
    "--extensions CustomFilter --global-response-templating --verbose --port " + WIREMOCK_PORT)
.withFileSystemBind("./src/test/resources/extensions", "/var/wiremock/extensions", BindMode.READ_WRITE)

, but had no luck

Hi there. I have a question on wire-mock. so using wire-mock to test Feign-client APIs. the mock feign client api are called in different test classes. the unit test pass if they are running separately, but when running all the unit tests wiremock throws exception

Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'mockDataDirectorManagementClient' defined in com.unisoftwareplus.devicemanagementgateway.mockserver.WireMockConfig: Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.FatalStartupException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Failed to bind to /0.0.0.0:9561

how is it possible to set up dynamic port. using the below dependency

testImplementation 'org.wiremock:wiremock-standalone:3.0.4'

Hi @Lee Turner @Oleg Nenashev - Thank you for your help so far. I am able to achieve a response (as a XML file) from the request (based on BodyPattern). Next, I want to have a delay for a few seconds and want to send the new response (XML file) to another different URL. Need help with this, please?

We have a need to mimic an external 3rd party webservice endpoint for our internal dev testing needs. We have we have been able to use fixed/static soap responses by putting the hard coded response files under __files/ directory of wiremock. For the matching request, the hard coded response from the file wsdl/2019-12-21_WEP.xml is spitted out perfectly.

"request" : {
      "url" : "/some/operation1",
      "method" : "POST"
    },
    "response" : {
      "status" : 200,
      "bodyFileName" : "wsdl/2019-12-21_WEP.xml",
      "headers" : {
        "Content-Type" : "text/xml"
      },
      "transformers" : [ "response-template" ]
    }

Now the need is to extract some xpath values from the in coming soap request body and replace/substitute them in the hard code soap responses at runtime. Using the soapXPath helpers mentioned in the section https://wiremock.org/docs/response-templating/#xpath-helpers of the documentation, extraction of the value can be done. However we are unable to find how to insert those into the soap response . ---we want to dynamically replace certain parts of the hard coded soap response that is in the file wsdl/2019-12-21_WEP.xml What are the possible ways to do this using wiremock. Thanks in advance.

Is there any plans to support

WithTransformers("response-template")

go wiremock client sometime soon ? also will below work if we havent passed `-local-response-templating`during startup ?

{
  "request": {
    "method": "POST",
    "url": "/v2/operations"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "transformers": [
      "response-template"
    ],
    "bodyFileName": "reversal.json"
  }
}

Hi! Is there any kind of mechanism in WireMock with which one could detect unused stub-mappings, so that any unnecessary ones could be cleaned up as part of test data maintenance? I've been thinking of adding some kind of visualization of this in the WireMocha IntelliJ plugin, but I'm not sure if it is even possible to achieve this, and if yes, how.

hi, I'm trying to return a dynamic response (

{{now}}

) using

docker

image not

jar

https://wiremock-community.slack.com/archives/C053Y3N34C8/p1695649886746049

I want to repeat a state of one scenario 3 times and wanted to reset the state I am trying to use stateful behaviour of WireMock

WireMock.setScenarioState("my_scenario", "state_2");

in Kotlin and Micronaut environment and it does not work