Hi All, I am facing issue with using wire mock 2.35.0 with spring boot version 3. The error is due to mismatch version of jetty jars. Is it a known issue? Any workaround?

Hi all, I needed help I wanted to use the stubbed response in the request body for webhook using response templating. Is there any way to do it? For eg. I generate a random UUID in the stubbed response for the original request and want to use that same UUID in the webhook request body.

Hello everyone Does Wiremock supports rate limit yet? I had tried to looking through document and googled for it but I didn't find any?

Hi Team, I'm mocking an api cal with condition like , calculate the date range ( start and stop date sent in query) and send the response if they fall into a specific range like 2 months or 3 months and error if 5 or other range months .Any thoughts, please?.

Hi Everyone, I’m trying to record some Stubs, but I would like that the Stubs created ignore the Body of my requests. Is that Possible? I see a lot of options i requestBodyPattern, but I don’t see any “ignore”. Could you help me please? Thanks a lot!

Hi, Does anyone have a reply to my previous message please: Hey everyone, I am trying to use the JsonPathMatcher but don't seem to be getting any success. I am using wiremock.net nuget in a .NET6 project. this is the code I have: This is my request: { "person": { "forename": "Test", "surname": "APPLE" } } server.Given(Request.Create().WithPath(_urlPath).WithHeader("content-type", "application/json").UsingPost().WithBody(new JsonPathMatcher("$.person.surname == 'APPLE'"))).RespondWith(Response.Create().WithStatusCode(200).WithHeader("content-type", "application/json;charset=UTF-8").WithBodyAsJson(new FileInfo("ResponseFiles/Apple.json").FullName)); I have tried using the following variations: new JsonPathMatcher("[?(@.surname == 'APPLE')]") new JsonPathMatcher("person.surname == 'APPLE')]") Any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂

Hi everyone 🙌! I’m trying to develop a project with springboot to set up a mock server, but all the jsons configured at mappings directory, doesn’t work. However, if I configure the stub like this (in the springboot main class):

@EventListener(ApplicationReadyEvent.class)
    void configureStubs() {
        stubFor(get(urlPathMatching("/hello-world")).willReturn(aResponse()
                .withHeader("Content-Type", "text/plain")
                .withBody("Hello World")));
    }

the endpoint works properly… How can I set the jsons file directory in application.yml to configure all my endpoints? Thanks!

Hi All, I am trying to deploy

wiremock

in

k8s

environment and make it use redis to store the mappings so it can withstand pods going down or scaleout/scalein scenarios. What's the best way to approach this? Or any other recommended setup? Help is greatly appreciated 🙏

HI All, I am trying callback functionality with Wiremock standalone server It works fine when I pass the static values in the "url" field under postServeActions My scenario is that I have to capture the host and port of the incoming request and the same host and port are needed for the callback URL. my mapping body is below and the callback is not getting work as {{request.baseUrl}} value is not getting replaced in "url" field, please help me out here

{
  "request": {
    "url": "/wiremock/middesk/v1/businesses",
    "method": "POST",
    "bodyPatterns": [
      {
        "matchesJsonPath": {
          "expression": "$..tin",
          "contains": "123"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "bodyFileName": "middesk-compliance-partner/customer_response/middeskInitiateResponse_success.json",
    "headers": {
      "Content-Type": "application/json; charset=utf-8"
    },
    "transformers": [
      "response-template",
      "body-transformer"
    ]
  },
  "postServeActions": [
    {
      "name": "webhook",
      "parameters": {
        "headers": {
          "Content-Type": "application/json"
        },
        "method": "POST",
        "url": "{{request.baseUrl}}/?code={{randomValue type='UUID'}}&state={{originalRequest.query.state}}",
        "delay": {
          "type": "fixed",
          "milliseconds": 10
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

First check: did you enable response templating when starting the standalone server using either —global-response-templating or —local-response-templating? See https://wiremock.org/docs/running-standalone/#command-line-options

Hi everyone, is there a way to make standalone jar to create one big mapping file instead of a directory with request and bodys file separate during recording? If not, what is the easiest way to make such one file?

Hi All,

Iam mocking some data .In response for current date iam using regular expression {{now formate yyyyMMdd}} if i want to add 3 days to the current date can i know regular expression for future date.

Hi Team, In the request header, is there a possiblity in wiremock to fetch the dynamic data. For eg. "Authorization" : {{dynamic-data}} Is this is the approach? There is an api, which will consist this Authorization header, in this how dynamic data can be fetched.

Hi Team, My scenerio is that, in the request header wanted to validate the value...based upon that required to have a response. For eg: In the request header "Abc" : {{dynamic value(base 64 encoded)}} Have to decode that value. Apply the validation and check if that decoded value contains certain chars. If yes render 200 response else 400 response. Here I dont wanted to reuse the value in response, instead have to apply validation and toggle the success and failure response. Is anyone can recommend some example related to this. Thanks.

Hello there... I have some trouble understanding the WireMock integration in Spring Boot. Setting up a stub seems to be possible by either using static

WireMock.stubFor()

or WireMockExtension's

wireMockExtension.stubFor()

. In the following

@SpringBootTest

only

wireMockExtension.stubFor()

seems to work.

WireMock.stubFor()

gives a 404 and a message that there are no registered stubs. What's the difference between both variants and in which cases would one use one or the other? Here is a sample test...

@SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
@WireMockTest
class WiremockSpringbootApplicationTests {

    @Value("${remote.url}")
    private String remoteUrl;

    @RegisterExtension
    static WireMockExtension wireMockExtension = WireMockExtension.newInstance()
            .options(wireMockConfig().dynamicPort())
            .build();

    // set remote.url dynamically based on WireMock instance
    @DynamicPropertySource
    static void dynamicProperties(DynamicPropertyRegistry registry) {
        registry.add("remote.url", wireMockExtension::baseUrl);
    }

    @Test
    void should_return_test() {
        final WebClient webClient = WebClient.builder().baseUrl(remoteUrl).build();

        // this stubbing works...
        wireMockExtension.stubFor(get("/test")
                .willReturn(aResponse().withBody("test")));

        // ... this doesn't and gives a 404
        // WireMock.stubFor(get("/test")
        //         .willReturn(aResponse().withBody("test")));

        final String responseString = webClient.get().uri("/test")
                .retrieve()
                .bodyToMono(String.class)
                .block();

        Assertions.assertThat(responseString).isEqualTo("test");
    }
}

Hi Team, 1. Is it possible to fetch dynamic value in request header (not in response) in line no 75 of this image. 2. To have the value of that key, inorder to validate the content inside it. (For reference in line 79). Thanks.

Can someone please confirm, if the wiremock supports the above functionality in request headers.

Hello Experts, I have a requirement and an idea, please go through and share your thoughts. I'm planing to use wiremock replacing our existing API mocking tool. Current tool has inline javascript shell calls at response side. Few JS are simple which I can replicate in wiremock easily using regex and conditions. While few others have nested/multiple conditions and in few one js calls another. I have the option of using wiremock's ResponseDefinitionTransformer/extension but the point is, it ends up to be an extra build step for each change we need unlike js which is called by the current tool directly from mapping json. With my knowledged on wiremock I do not know if wiremock has any option for inline or passing script, so was thinking if I can create a js handlebar to execute the javascript and map it to wiremocking. In this way I can pass js as inline and the handlebar takes care of the rest. I do not have to build extension each time I need a change in my response logic. Sorry for loooonggg para.

hey guys. I'm trying todo the stateful behavior. I've created this scenario in the mapping folder

{
  "mappings": [
    {
      "scenarioName": "PDP Product",
      "requiredScenarioState": "Started",
      "newScenarioState": "Product selected",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "url": "/api/v3/xxxlutz.at/products/008021030201"
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 200,
        "bodyFileName": "req.json"
      }
    },
    {
      "scenarioName": "PDP Product",
      "requiredScenarioState": "Product selected",
      "request": {
        "method": "GET",
        "url": "api/v3/xxxlutz.at/carts/155294111"
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 200,
        "bodyFileName": "cart.json"
      }
    }
  ]
}

the route is samples/hello/stubs/mappings/expensive.json

my problem is the fist scenario works fine but when I co to the next scenario doesn't change how I should do to activate the scenario state?

that works how I can deactivate the scenario?

with docker

thanks in advance

I am new to wiremock I have very basic question can anyone help

i have a server running at localhost:8000 with endpoint getbalance

i want run wiremock running at 9000 and intercept calls to localhost:8000 and return the response which i configure in wiremock

instead of what my origial server returns

I ran wiremock with command java -jar wiremock-jre8-standalone-2.35.0.jar -port 9000 --proxy-all http://localhost:8000 --verbose

and provided mapping