Hello everyone! Is it possible to add server-side random mocking capability in WireMock, similar to how mockjs operates on the server side?

For those WireMock users who speak Russian 🙂

Hey folks. qq: When running Wiremock as a standalone docker container, is there a way to get it to reload my mappings / files as I change on the local filesystem? Seems like they're read on startup, so each change requires a restart cycle. Currently using 2.35.0.

Hi all. Would anyone be interested in having "contributor office hours" as a regular timeslot for discussing the recent developments, getting pull requests over the line, whatever development Q&A, etc. ?

hey folks , i am using wirmock standlone server with postman , in mapping file i have 2 json file and in my Json i am using postServerAction . { "request": { "urlPath": "/", "method": "POST" }, "response": { "status": 200, "headers": { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, "jsonBody": { "responseId": "123456" } }, "postServeActions": [ { "name": "webhook", "parameters": { "method": "POST", "url": "/", "headers": { "Content-Type": "application/json" }, "body": "{ \"requestId\": \"{{jsonPath request.body '$.requestId'}}\" }", "response": { "jsonBody": { "message": "Callback request processed successfully" } } } } ] } when i am hitting the endpoint then getting response as responseId-12345 i am not confirmed my callback is hitting or not,how can i verify ?

Good opportunity to contribute: https://wiremock-community.slack.com/archives/C04JE0AFE76/p1693384741349839 . A lot of potential small patches in WireMock documentation and integration tests

Welcome!

antonio

joined #general.

Great day @ JavaZone today, if anyone here is also going to be there tomorrow, be sure to come by the Telenor stand around 14-1930 for a great chat! See you there!

Any strong opinions about Vcpkg vs Conan regarding a WireMock for C and Testcontainers C distributions for the PoC I am working on?

Hi everyone. I am new to Wiremock and need some help/suggestions. I am trying to set a request and response pair. This means I always want to get a response A when the request is B. Request files are of XML type. I am able to use the below code to use the XML file path in the response body using "bodyFileName" parameter.

{
  "request": {
    "method": "GET",
    "url": "/body-file"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "bodyFileName": "path/to/myfile.xml"
  }
}

I am not sure how can I also give "bodyFileName" in the request body. As I want to give a path for my request xml file the way I have given on the response. Kindly advice. thanks

Hi, I've just started using Wiremock to proxy requests to other services and record mappings for playback and I noticed that insertionIndex is in reverse order. For example there are 5 requests. Request 1 has index 5 and Request 5 has index 1. Is it by design? Can I save mappings by myself with reserved index without breaking playback? What I want to achieve is to have mappings files' names starting with request number to intuitively go through history from file 1 not for example 15. Of course I set

.filenameTemplate("{{{insertionIndex}}}.json")

wiremock 3.0.3

Hi all.. I'm new to Wiremock standalone. I want to add the webhooks extension to the java class path to use it in wiremock. can someone give a detailed step-wise instruction for the same

Hi everyone. I'm trying to match a header with a body request attribute. I've tried it:

<http://WireMock.post|WireMock.post>(WireMock.urlPathTemplate(PATH))
    .atPriority(1)
    .withPathParam("instrumentReferenceId", matchingJsonPath("$.requestId"))
    .willReturn(WireMock.badRequest()));

But, I get this response (see image): There is anyway to match a path param with body request attribute? Can I use matchingJsonPath and withPathParam together?

WireMock team at APIDays London. They will be there tomorrow too, just in case you want to come over

Hi team can we add any condition to generate the response. If I trying to if any particular field is present is the request then only I will add thet field to the response

Hi folks, Does WireMock 3 support Https forward proxy? I found an old issue which says otherwise https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/139 My use case: App makes https calls. I am trying to use WireMock 3 to intercept the https call and then forward proxy certain calls to the server as needed.

Are there any strategies/patterns folks recommend for managing many mocks across different use cases and teams? For example, it’s getting difficult to remember what test case a mock was meant for.

I’ve started making some significant progress on building an official gRPC extension so I thought I should create an issue to track and discuss: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/issues/2383 If you’ve got any specific requirements you’d like to see satisfied or stories to tell about testing gRPC apps please share!

Hi everyone, I believe webhooks are not working in 3.0.4 when using it with extension- is that a known issue? I just saw a major change for webhooks in 3.1.0

WireMock 3.1.0 Docker images are live: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-docker/releases/tag/3.1.0-1

My slides from today's meetup on API integration testing with Testcontainers and WireMock at JUG CH 🇨🇭 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jsKOpvufGL-Fnd9ehFZTUYu64QGL6OtTm9THvlY7_2M/edit?usp=drivesdk