Hi, I'm trying to use #eq with request.body field inside the response file and it's not working. I'm getting an error.

{

"id": "12345",

"country":  "{{jsonPath request.body '$.country'}}",

"capital": "{{#eq (jsonPath request.body '$.country') 'France'}}}Paris{{else}}Sorry{{/eq}}"

}

Hello Guys, any way to lock wiremock studio ui with password?

This message was deleted.

Hi, I have an app in node js and i want to virtulize the external dependencies of type REST API’s, i see there are two options, 1. with wiremock standalone 2. is there any standard library with npm i can use and get started ? I want to have service virtualization of the external dependencies in my source code repo and I have a workflow which run in pipeline Cheers,

Hi, is there any way by which we can give role based access for wiremock APIs in swagger?

Hey wiremock #general team, I am using wiremock where at one point i got struck. I have a same response for multiple requests where in only header gets changed. So i want a JSON such that, i have to match headers if its present in one of the specified values. Could you please help me with that?

Hello, I have a question/request - I have made callback/webhook stub in WM and it works but I am currently stuck on how to access needed data from original request header. I need to pass an id from original request header to callback but I have no idea how. In WM documentation I have found only examples of how to pass parts of request body using jsonpath. But as far as I know request header is not JSON so it cant be used. Can any1 help?

Good morning. I'm mocking a WCF POST method to be consumed by a WCF, by Visual Studio 2019, but I'm getting this error: "The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found." The interesting thing is that via SOAPUI when I call the WireMock route it works but Visual Studio presents the error.

Hi All, Not sure if this is a possibility. Can we do a if condition in wiremock mapping to pick the response body based on a certain input value(s)

HELP

Is there a way to add a keystore to wiremock studio?

wiremock Morning, happy to announce that I have joined WireMock Inc! My goal is to help build a vibrant user and developer community around the open source WireMock ecosystem and WireMock Cloud. Looking forward to working with all team members and contributors to WireMock! About me: I've been a user of WireMock since many years ago, mostly for the Jenkins open source project and for the commercial products on the top of it. I've been in open source since 2012, and I joined the Jenkins core team in 2014 after many years of tinkering with it and developer tools for hardware and embedded projects. Now I am a governance board member there, and also a TOC member in the Continuous Delivery Foundation. I also participate in many FOSS/InnerSource focused orgs and in the OpenTelemetry, Keptn and OpenFeature project. I'm based in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, donc bonjour! A few items on the top of my head: 1. Facilitate the community channels, including this Slack and social media 2. Introduce the public roadmap for WireMock (as a GitHub project) 3. Facilitate Python SDK for WireMock, and container-based use with TestContainers and other tools 4. Kick-off office hours and, later, webinars for WireMock users and developers 5. Improve the GitHub org to make it contributions ready. A bunch of housekeeping but it should make things easier for those who want to contribute 6. Documentation, documentation, documentation 🙂 If you have any questions or suggestions, please ask them here or in DM. Any feedback will be appreciated! And let me know how you see the priorities for this role!

P,S: wiremock emoji in this chat is one of my first contributions 🙂

Is it possible with some helper with scenario make wiremock response with value in order? Example 1. I make 3 scenarios with POST:/shops and this point has 3 scneario responses a.

{ "name": "first" }

b.

{ "name": "two" }

c.

{ "name": "three" }

I want to know nay be already present helpers like

{ "name": "{{#responseInOrder 'first' 'two' 'three'}}" }

For request matching, does

bodyPatterns

combine the predicates with AND or OR?

AND

But there are now AND and OR matcher combinators so you can choose either

Hi, With standalone jar, I have to mock the API URI that contain the query parameters with square brackets. Example : my-service/api/v1/customers?filter[profile-id]=101101 In my json file I have tried urlPath with queryParameters, urlPattern combination but it is not working because of the square bracket. It works if the query parameter does not have square bracket. Pls guide how to make the square bracket work in the query parameter?

To follow up on the "Making Community Better" subject above, I started a backlog for the items I'd like to work on https://github.com/wiremock/community/issues. If you have any ideas how we could enhance and scale the things, just submit an issue for the backlog: https://github.com/wiremock/community/issues

I consider starting office hours for whatever WireMock user and contributor Q&A. Would someone be interested? Let me know. There is no mandatory attendance, unless you want to ask something or just have a virtual coffee ☕

is a coffee addict. This is what 10 years of java do to you

I spent some time on updating the website engine and preparing it for continuous delivery. It still needs quite a lot of updates, but it looks now we can deploy it with recent versions, including GitHub Pages with standard actions. Would appreciate feedback and reviews. https://wiremock.github.io/wiremock.org-sources/ https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock.org-sources/pull/25

📢 Hi all! Make sure to join the #announcements channel if you have not done it yet. We'll try to use it for key announcement (new release, features, community news and events)

I've fully set up my development environment, and I want to spend some time with WireMock's pull request backlog: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pulls . If you're waiting for any features, please let me know so that I could prioritize accordingly! P.S: I am not formally a maintainer, but I will do my best to do the first round of reviews and then do another round with @Tom to help the PRs and study at the same time

For the issue templates I plan to start from all the repositories except wiremock/wiremock which has a global override already. So we will be able to evaluate it before rolling out to the main repo If anyone is interested, I can create a #community-management channel so that I do not pollute general channel with all the community stuff UPD: the #community-management channel is now created

I am assembling viable opensource projects related to WireMock: implementations, DSL and Docker wrappers, developer tools, extensions and IDE plugins, tutorials, etc., etc. If you know about something that I missed, please suggest changes in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TQccT9Bk-o2lvRVN8_mMaGttaOnwbYFLkn0DsmwGIOA/edit?usp=sharing! P.S: The longer term goal for me is to document the ecosystem, promote them and, should any maintainers be interested, help to move to the WireMock GitHub and adopt other community channels.

Hello. I got flucky test with scenarios I have two stubs with requiredScenarioState and newScenarioState. Some launches I see that wiremock matches first scenario with

"requiredScenarioState": "Started"

What can u suggest me to resolve this problem? Env: Wiremock in docker, stubs load in @BeforeAll once

{
  "scenarioName": "11544",
  "requiredScenarioState": "Started",
  "newScenarioState": "SecondRequest",
  "request": {
    "url": "/test",
    "method": "POST"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "jsonBody": {
      "items": []
    },
    "headers": {
      "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }
  }
}

{
  "scenarioName": "11544",
  "requiredScenarioState": "SecondRequest",
  "request": {
    "url": "/test",
    "method": "POST"
  },
  "response": {
    "status": 200,
    "jsonBody": {
      "items": [
        {
          "field": "value"
        }
      ]
    },
    "headers": {
      "Content-Type": "application/json"
    }
  }
}

Time for a new motto and open ecosystem consolidation? 😃

set the channel topic: 📢 We're moving key announcements to #announcements. Make sure to join this channel if this chat gets too busy for you to follow!

Hello everyone What is the recommended setting with regards to the following configs to handle requests from users in the use case of a mock server? • ContainerThread • JettyAcceptQueueSize • AsynchronousResponseThreads