hello, can i use the wiremock studio jar to run it on my corporate?

or it requires some sort of auth

Hello WireMock Studio isn't really intended for enterprise usage and we've changed focus a bit, meaning we won't be releasing any new versions of it in the near future. You're welcome to use it, but there will not be any updates, support or warranties of any kind. I strongly recommend taking a look at WireMock Cloud, which is the enterprise grade edition of WireMock, and the current focus of the company's resources. We will also deliver soon a K8s and private VPC version of WireMock Cloud

Hello How can I configure Wiremock to disable pooling HTTP connections in my tests? I'm using the

@AutoConfigureWireMock(port = 0)

annotation right now. I could add `.withHeader(HttpHeaders.CONNECTION, "close")`to every single stub, but I guess there is a better more general solution. Thank you

oh, so wiremock studio is not open source? i can not get it and make my own changes

does anyone knows how this project injected an angular ui in the the wiremock admin, i reviewd all the code, no routes or something https://github.com/holomekc/wiremock

Hey Everyone, I am trying to setup wiremock with my emulator to capture and modify(similar to what mitmproxy does) http and https request for android native app. 1. I have installed the certificate in emulator. 2. I want to only intercept 2-3 any call (there are 100s of different call to different host). So basically want to whitelist every other call except the ones I wan to put stub for.

HashMap<ExecutionDataKeys, Object> executionStates = new HashMap<>();
WireMockServer wireMockServer = new WireMockServer(
        new WireMockConfiguration().port(8080)
                .notifier(new Slf4jNotifier(true))
);
wireMockServer.start();
ArrayList<String> hostNames = new ArrayList<>(
        Arrays.asList(
                "<https://host1.com>",
                "<https://host2.com>",
        ));

hostNames.forEach(host->{
    wireMockServer.stubFor(any(urlMatching(host+".*"))
            .atPriority(10)
            .willReturn(aResponse().proxiedFrom(host)));
});

I have also set proxy in emulator to localhost:8080. But it seems whitlisting is not working. all of my request are getting blocked. P.S. I am trying to use appium along with wiremock to test state changes in application

I have already waster 3-4 days on this, and feeling kind exausted in this.

Please advice

Hey people 👋

Wondering has anyone tried wiremock with fips mode? From the Github it seems it’s not supported yet 🤔

Hi Folks - Would appreciate your help, I am trying to generate JWT in a response body but it is not working. Could someone please help out? Thanks so much!!

Hi, Im having a problem where I need to mock a POST request that in the body contains json where one of the values is a list of floats, in the response I need to return this same list of floats back. I am using the python API for wiremock and have tried "{{jsonPath request.body '$.value'}}" in the jsonBody using a response-transformer. That kind of works but the returned list of floats is represented as a string ie. '[1.1, 1.2, 1.3]' etc. is there any way to have this returned as an actual list of floats in the json body of the response?

Hi ! Is it possible to use BasicAuth with wiremock studio without adding an nginx server or whatever behind ?

Hi guys, I am wondering about the free version and the availability of the API's. There is a mention about a "sleep time". How does it work?

Hi, I am new to wiremock, my requirement is to build a stub framework within my application where anyone from frontend can access the stub apis for their use. I mostly found out about wiremock that it is integrated with Junit tests, but I want to use in my main application not in test cases. Any github link or documentation, where I can refer to. Thanks

Hi is is possible to horizontally scale wiremock service using docker-compose. i am facing a challenge where we are executing http://<DNS>/__admin/requests api, as it is fetching data from local memory.

Hi , Quick question - Is it possible to import openapi spec to wiremock opensource ?

@Tom - Grateful if you could clarify ?

Hi this functionality is not supported in the open source - we do have this functionality in WireMock cloud

Currently listening to none other than @Tom on https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2023/02/22/creating-mock-apis-with-wiremock/ 🥳

Hello I got a step here of the wirmoc studio on kubenetes cluster and it is exposed through dns record How I can reach to the mocks since it is indicating only localhost access ?

I am using this image

up9inc/wiremock-studio:2.32.0-17

and this setup https://wiremock.org/studio/docs/getting-started/kubernetes/

my inly issue that I can not reach any new mocks 😞 please can you support

Hi Everyone. I have an issue using Wiremock 2.35 on java 11. SSL in my application is FIPS compatible and configured in a specific way, and it fails like this:

java.lang.NullPointerException: No password supplied for PKCS#12 KeyStore.

	at org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.ProvPKCS12$PKCS12KeyStoreSpi.engineLoad(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.security.KeyStore.load(KeyStore.java:1479)
	at java.base/sun.security.ssl.TrustStoreManager$TrustAnchorManager.loadKeyStore(TrustStoreManager.java:365)
	at java.base/sun.security.ssl.TrustStoreManager$TrustAnchorManager.getTrustedCerts(TrustStoreManager.java:313)
	at java.base/sun.security.ssl.TrustStoreManager.getTrustedCerts(TrustStoreManager.java:55)
	at java.base/sun.security.ssl.TrustManagerFactoryImpl.engineInit(TrustManagerFactoryImpl.java:49)
	at java.base/javax.net.ssl.TrustManagerFactory.init(TrustManagerFactory.java:278)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.ssl.SSLContextBuilder.loadTrustManagers(SSLContextBuilder.java:92)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.ssl.SSLContextBuilder.loadDefaultTrustManagers(SSLContextBuilder.java:99)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.ssl.SSLContextBuilder.loadTrustMaterial(SSLContextBuilder.java:82)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.HttpClientFactory.buildAllowAnythingSSLContext(HttpClientFactory.java:222)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.HttpClientFactory.buildSslContext(HttpClientFactory.java:154)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.HttpClientFactory.createClient(HttpClientFactory.java:111)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.ProxyResponseRenderer.<init>(ProxyResponseRenderer.java:82)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.core.WireMockApp.buildStubRequestHandler(WireMockApp.java:181)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.<init>(WireMockServer.java:72)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit5.WireMockExtension.startServerIfRequired(WireMockExtension.java:144)
	at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit5.WireMockExtension.beforeAll(WireMockExtension.java:206)
	at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.ClassBasedTestDescriptor.lambda$invokeBeforeAllCallbacks$12(ClassBasedTestDescriptor.java:395)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
	at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.ClassBasedTestDescriptor.invokeBeforeAllCallbacks(ClassBasedTestDescriptor.java:395)
	at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.ClassBasedTestDescriptor.before(ClassBasedTestDescriptor.java:211)
	at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.ClassBasedTestDescriptor.before(ClassBasedTestDescriptor.java:84)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$6(NodeTestTask.java:148)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$8(NodeTestTask.java:141)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.Node.around(Node.java:137)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$9(NodeTestTask.java:139)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.executeRecursively(NodeTestTask.java:138)
	at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.execute(NodeTestTask.java:95)

I use wire mock in a basic (plain connection/no proxy) scenario, but because of application-wide SSL configuration, it fails: • Wiremock doesn’t pick up keystore or trust store types from the options - it uses default types. So it picks up the default pkcs12 store type, which is not fips compatible and fails. • And I cannot work it around by reconfiguring the SSL layer just to let Wiremock run. I tried different options but it seems the only way forward is to configure wiremock server in SSL mode - generate self-signed certs, etc. It feels redundant. Do you know if I can bypass the SSL setup completely? I use

httpsEnabled=false

and don’t need it in my scenarios. Thank you

Hi @Tom & Team - I am looking for help for a use case where my team is trying to retrieve and image of size greaer than 1 MB using Wire Mock service. Service is working up to to 1 MB file size however for file size >1 mb its throwing http 500 error.

HTTP ERROR 500 wiremock.com.google.common.util.concurrent.UncheckedExecutionException: wiremock.com.github.jknack.handlebars.HandlebarsException: inline@1c1f50f413: found: '?' {{???m?m?b2??8>?5?_????mR ^

Hi Guys. I'm trying to get standalone wiremock to match a different route depending on a header in the request and it isn't working. Here is my routes.json (relevant snippet)

{
      "request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "url": "/middleware-nz-sandbox/v2.0/domestic-payment-consents",
        "headers": {
            "x-fapi-interaction-id": {
                "equalTo": "okay"
            }
        }
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 201,
        "bodyFileName": "payment-consents.json"
      }
    },
    {
      "request": {
        "method": "POST",
        "url": "/middleware-nz-sandbox/v2.0/domestic-payment-consents",
        "headers": {
            "x-fapi-interaction-id": {
                "equalTo": "error"
            }
        }
      },
      "response": {
        "status": 500,
        "bodyFileName": "payment-consents-error.json"
      }
    },

So I want the requests that match the URL and which have a header of 'okay' to match the first, and if they match the same url but have a header of 'error' I want to match the second. However they always match the first route. I'm running this. I run Wiremock as a standalone image, one of several started by docker-compose. It works fine in most cases but in this one case the matching is not working how I had hoped. (version of Wiremock: 2.32.0) Have I got a mistake in the routes file or does this just not work? Thanks

This may be of interest to folks https://twitter.com/maciejwalkowiak/status/1630248586557673472 👀