https://www.wiremock.io logo
Join Slack
Powered by
# help
  • a
    Hello everyone. I use wiremock grpc extension with standalone wiremock instance. In .proto file I have something like 
    map<string, any>
    . My response looks like
    Copy code
    "data": {
          "price": {
            "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.DoubleValue",
            "value": 0.00873388535031847
          }
        },
        "user": {
          "userId": "5235435"
        }
    But wiremock throw an exception:
    Copy code
    wiremock.com.google.protobuf.InvalidProtocolBufferException: Cannot resolve type: type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.DoubleValue	at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.mergeAny(JsonFormat.java:1511)	at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.access$2000(JsonFormat.java:1276)	at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl$1.merge(JsonFormat.java:1343)	at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.merge(JsonFormat.java:1432)	at wiremock.com.google.protobuf.util.JsonFormat$ParserImpl.parseFieldValue(JsonFormat.java:1995)
    Any clue what's wrong?
  • d
    Hello everyone I am looking for an overload of docker registry, we are using azure acr for storing and pulling docker images and would like wiremock to try pull from acr and not docker hub while executing test. Can you please help?
    t
    • 2
    • 8
  • j
    Hi, does anyone know how to enable logging for grpc requests? I've already enabled grpc extensions and also turned on --verbose, but still cannot see any grpc requests in the log.
    l
    • 2
    • 2
  • v
    Hi everyone, nice to join you. Could you help whether wiremock-grpc-extension supports bidirectional streaming with multiple responses?
    t
    • 2
    • 1
  • h
    Hi everyone, am trying to create a mock for application/xml request. I need to initiate callback on request. Also, need to copy the parameters from original request to callback request. what handlers do I need to use?. am using a wiremock-standalone-3.13.1.jar version of wiremock. #C03N1E6HFPY
    t
    • 2
    • 10
  • h
    One more question.. in "serveEventListeners" can I only use body? can't bodyfilename not supported in this version of wiremock ? I wanted to use for callback requests.. #C03N1E6HFPY
    l
    • 2
    • 3
  • s
    This message was deleted.
    l
    w
    • 3
    • 2
  • s
    This message was deleted.
    l
    w
    • 3
    • 2
  • a
    Hi! I want to create 2 stubs for the same endpoint to validate service's behavior. So I decided to filter the incoming requests by a form param:
    Copy code
    wireMock.stubFor(<http://WireMock.post|WireMock.post>("/convert")
        .withFormParam("amount", WireMock.equalTo("10.50"))
        .willReturn(responseDefinition1));

    wireMock.stubFor(<http://WireMock.post|WireMock.post>("/convert")
        .withFormParam("amount", WireMock.equalTo("12.50"))
        .willReturn(responseDefinition2));
    However, the 
    amount
    can easily be 
    10.5
    or 
    12.5
    due to inconsistent precision, and that doesn't work - 
    10.50
    and 
    10.5
    are different strings. I solved this by extending 
    StringValuePattern
    and overriding it's matcher which now converts both values to 
    BigDecimal
    and compares them with 
    compareTo
    . My concern is that I perhaps overengineered this and missed a simpler solution. Is there one to compare decimal values in form params? I only found a similar issue with JSON bodies: https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock/pull/2588
    t
    • 2
    • 3
  • p
    Hello, I’m using the latest version of WireMock-GO and trying to configure a response with "WithJSONBody". However, I’m having trouble passing a JSONPath helper inside the body template. Is there a way to include JSONPath helpers in a WithJSONBody response or other method? Here’s the error I’m getting: "build stub request error: json: unsupported type: func(string, interface {}) (string, error)" I suspect this happens because WithJSONBody is marshalling the template as JSON and treats the helpers as unsupported types. What is the recommended approach to return a JSON body that contains WireMock helpers like {{jsonPath ...}}?
    l
    m
    • 3
    • 4
  • s
    Unable to disable gzip in WireMock Docker – container exits immediately when using 
    --no-gzip
    Description:
     
    I'm running WireMock via Docker and trying to disable gzip compression because my client needs uncompressed responses.
    I've tried:
    1. 
    Setting the environment variable:
    docker run -d \ --name wiremock \ -p 8080:8080 \ -e WIREMOCK_NO_GZIP=true \ wiremock/wiremock:latest …but the responses still contain 
    Content-Encoding: gzip
    . 2. Passing 
    --no-gzip
    as a CLI flag: docker run --rm -it \ -p 8083:8080 \ wiremock/wiremock:3.9.1 \ --verbose --no-gzip …but the container immediately exits with: Exception in thread "main" java.util.MissingResourceException thrown from the UncaughtExceptionHandler in thread "main" 1. 3. Using older versions (e.g., 
    2.35.0
    ) with 
    --no-gzip
    results in:
    Copy code
    pgsql
    Copy code
    joptsimple.UnrecognizedOptionException: no-gzip is not a recognized option
    W*hat I’ve confirmed:* • Docker image pulls and runs fine without 
    --no-gzip
    . • Problem only occurs when trying to disable gzip. • Removing containers and images before retrying doesn’t fix it. Questions for the community: • What is the correct way to disable gzip in the latest WireMock Docker image? • Is 
    --no-gzip
    supported in the official Docker images, and if so, from which version? • Could the 
    MissingResourceException
    be a packaging issue in recent releases?
    l
    • 2
    • 1
  • t
    Hey everyone, It is possible to use WireMock in Cluster mode? I tried this and configured multiple replicas in my Kubernetes Cluster. Besides this did I bound the 
    /mappings
    and 
    /files
    folder with a shared storage to each other. This work very well, but the other instances did not refresh the instance caches with the stored mappings. Is there a configuration/setting that could help in this case?
    l
    • 2
    • 3
  • m
    Hello Team ! Is it possible to generate a stub server from an OpenAPI specification using the WireMock standalone JAR? I noticed that this option is available in WireMock Cloud, but I couldn’t find a similar feature in the standalone JAR.
    l
    • 2
    • 4
  • j
    Hello! I'm having what I think is a silly issue, but I can't figure it out. I'm seeing errors from my local app saying 
    java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/wiremock/./__files/responses
    which makes sense because it seems like that path is incorrect. The problem is I can't figure out how to correct it. I've defined wiremock in my docker compose (defined at 
    .docker/compose.yml
    as follows:
    Copy code
    wiremock:
    image: wiremock/wiremock:3.12.1
    container_name: wiremock
    ports:
      - "3000:8080"
    volumes:
      - ../wire-mock:/home/wiremock
    entrypoint: ["/docker-entrypoint.sh", "--global-response-templating", "--disable-gzip", "--verbose"]
    my wiremock directory is a top level directory at 
    wire-mock
    in the project Any help would be greatly appreciated. thanks y'all
    l
    j
    • 3
    • 9
  • t
    Hi there! I have some troubles with wiremock, for example, when it returns a 500 error. but the response to the embedded answer is returned correctly. And I am a complete newbie in using this tool. Can you please tell me how and where the application logs are saved?
    l
    • 2
    • 3
  • c
    Hello! We are looking for a contractor to help us with our wiremock mapping project for our 100+ API calls across various financial cores. We are a platform on Pega so Pega experience is a must. Is there someone here with this experience or any recommendations?
    b
    • 2
    • 4
  • j
    Hi folks, all good? There are a few CVE open issues for wiremock-docker. Is this something prioritized by anyone? https://github.com/wiremock/wiremock-docker/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20CVE
    t
    • 2
    • 1
  • g
    Hi, If I change anything in API response from mappings folder and invoking the API in Postman without restarting the wiremock standalone server, My latest change in response is not reflected. I could see the response changes only after the wiremok standalone server re-start. I wanted to know is there any way to reflect my changes without restarting the wiremock standalone server and it should be available with hot reloading. I could observe the hot reloading can be achieved with below ways: 1. In mapping folder, responses should be mapped with filename and respective response contents should be placed in __files folder. So if i change the response content in __files folder and invoking the API in postman, it is reflecting immediately. 2. Once i have done the changes in response from mapping folder, if i hit the below API, and invoke the API for which i changed the response from Postman, I am getting the latest response. POST:<Local or Server endpoint>/__admin/mappings/reset Apart from these 2 approaches, I wanted to understand, is there any way, I am changing the response in mapping folder and invoking the same in Postman, i need to get the response with my latest changes. Kindly advise.
    t
    m
    • 3
    • 4
  • s
    Hello i have trouble in "absent" field. to check if 
    exist
    field inside the 
    auth
    object but when i pass the below pattern in mapping then it should point to different file but it is not doing - for both true and false it is going to same file, that is because it always maps to the same mapping irrespective i give 
    true
    or 
    false
    im using gradel deps --> implementation "com.github.tomakehurstwiremock jre8 standalone2.35.1
    Copy code
    "bodyPatterns": [
  {
    "matchesJsonPath": {
      "expression": "$.auth.exist",
        "absent": "false"
    }
  }
]
    t
    • 2
    • 3
  • m
    Hi! Is there a way in WireMock to record only the last request/response for the same method and URL - so each new matching request overwrites the previous recording? Right now I either get all duplicates or only the first one; I’d like the opposite: keep only the latest. Many thanks!
    t
    • 2
    • 2
  • a
    Hi team, there is vulnerability CVE-2018-9116 detected in the mavenorg.wiremockwiremock-standalone:3.13.1. Could you please provide details on a fix or recommended workaround? Thanks!
    l
    • 2
    • 6
  • d
    Hello there, getting below error whiling invoking wiremock endpoint(JSON stub deployed on different service) from a spring framework service A- `springframework.web.client.HttpClientErrorException$BadRequest: 400 Bad Request: "h1Bad Message 400/h1prereason: Bad Request/pre".
    Copy code
    Service A utilises  org.springframework.http to call APIs.

It is failing at the line of toEntity()-
    .retrieve()` 
    .toEntity(String.class);
    Other services like B uses apache camel(routes), from there when it is invoked it is working. Just wanted to understand is this any mock related issue or it do not support http of spring.
    l
    • 2
    • 2
  • o
    Hello everyone! I am very new to WireMock and I have an issue when hitting the endpoint /_admin/requests/reset, a GET returns 400 which makes sense , but a POST returns 404 error. The request journal is enabled and i get a correct response when running GET to /__admin/requests, what am I missing here? Is the endpoint unavailable? Because I've seen that it's deprecated_
    l
    • 2
    • 1
  • т
    Hello everybody! That's the question. We use Wiremock JSON to mock in vendor responses in our tests. Often, suppliers may send different responses to the same request. To do this, we use scenarios to get the right response at the right time. Previously, we implemented it in such a way that wiremock was raised for each test. Consequently, the scenarios were not interrupted in any way. Now we plan to raise 1 wiremock for multithreaded tests (20+ units). What will happen to the scenarios? Will they be able to run parallel to each other?
    t
    • 2
    • 2
  • m
    Hi team! I am working on setting up a wiremock proxy service that my team can use to mock responses from external apis. I am hitting an issue where a proxied response that is being forwarded to the actual service is returning a 403 error. When hitting the external api directly I can connect. Is there something specific I need to do in the proxy mapping to have the authorization headers from the original request forwarded through to the real service? Currently I just have the proxy mapping for any request that hits a specific urlPath.
    t
    • 2
    • 11
  • u
    Hello ! there is vulnerability CVE-2018-9116 detected by sonatype nexus iq Version is 4.0.0-beta.15 could you please help ? thanks
    l
    • 2
    • 1
  • m
    Hi everyone, I’m working on a WireMock Mapping and would be super grateful for some help. The WireMock receives a Request with a JWT as query parameter 
    code
    . I use 
    serveEventListeners
    to trigger a call. This call needs to extract the 
    sub
    claim from the JWT and include it as 
    user_id
    to body. I tried it with the jwt plugin like this 
    {{jwt path='sub' token=originalRequest.query.code}}
    but it generated a new jwt, what is not really what I need. Is there any way to only extract that claim from the token?
    t
    • 2
    • 3
  • r
    Hi everyone, I am running wiremock in playback mode where I use the data ( mappings and __files ) which I recorded by running wiremock in recording mode. When my wiremock instance is running in playback mode with recorded data I am noticing that after sometime my wiremock instance ( pod ) throws Java OOM exception. I tried increasing the memory but it only delays the outcome but doesn't stop it. Here are some settings ( image: wiremock/wiremock:3.3.1, JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: "-XX:+UseContainerSupport -Xms1g -Xmx8g", WIREMOCK_DISABLE_REQUEST_JOURNAL: "true" etc etc. ). Any idea what I may be missing or how to fix this issue of Java OOM?
    l
    • 2
    • 7
  • d
    Hello everyone, I'm posting a request with header 
    Content-Type: multipart/form-data
    to wiremock, as it's the only accepted content-type accepted by my real third-party. Using only basic JSON stub, is it possible to extract the body from the request and pass it to a webhook body ? When I post my request with content-type 
    application/json
    , the following stub works very well and I receive the transcript_id from the original request. But as soon as I send the original request with 
    multipart/form-data
    , it doesn't work anymore :
    Copy code
    {
  "request": ...,
  "response": ...,
  "serveEventListeners": [
    {
      "name": "webhook",
      "parameters": {
        ...
        "body": "{\"transcript_id\":\"{{jsonPath originalRequest.body '$.transcript_id'}}\"}"
      }
    }
  ]
}
    t
    • 2
    • 1
  • g
    Is there a way to get WM to work with Jetty 12.1 and EE11? java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.Environment org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.Environment.ensure(java.lang.String)' at org.eclipse.jetty.ee10.servlet.ServletContextHandler.clinit(ServletContextHandler.java:135) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.jetty12.Jetty12HttpServer.addAdminContext(Jetty12HttpServer.java:256) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.jetty12.Jetty12HttpServer.createHandler(Jetty12HttpServer.java:195) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.jetty.JettyHttpServer.init(JettyHttpServer.java:101) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.jetty12.Jetty12HttpServer.init(Jetty12HttpServer.java:74) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.jetty12.Jetty12HttpServerFactory.buildHttpServer(Jetty12HttpServerFactory.java:33) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.init(WireMockServer.java:75) at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit.WireMockRule.init(WireMockRule.java:36) Jetty doesn't keep binary compatibility from 12 to 12.1 😞
    t
    • 2
    • 8